Title: Best Armenian Lies
Nikephoros - November 11, 2006 08:27 PM (GMT)
Since the Turks in this forum like to make up lame stories here is what the best Armenian genocide scholar uses as as his best source, Ottoman cipher telegrams that were authenticated during the Ottoman post-war Court Martial.
page 322
page 323
The footnote sources at the end of the chapter that correspond to the footnotes of pages 322-323.
page 338
The bibliography source descriptions of the most important Ottoman/Turkish primary sources documents used for the study; the most important being Takvimi Vekayi which was nearly destroyed to cover up the crimes against humanity.
page 429
Dadrian, Vahakn, The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus Berghahn Books, Providence; 3rd revised edition, 1997.
page 322
page 323
The footnote sources at the end of the chapter that correspond to the footnotes of pages 322-323.
page 338
The bibliography source descriptions of the most important Ottoman/Turkish primary sources documents used for the study; the most important being Takvimi Vekayi which was nearly destroyed to cover up the crimes against humanity.
page 429
Dadrian, Vahakn, The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus Berghahn Books, Providence; 3rd revised edition, 1997.
Nikephoros - November 11, 2006 08:29 PM (GMT)
I need to proofread titles. Can some mod or admin correct my stupid typo, please.
Nikephoros - November 12, 2006 11:25 PM (GMT)
From the sub-section on the Special Organization which was used to exterminate the Armenians, some of the best sources used are from Iki Komite written by a former captain of the Ottoman War Office's Intelligence Department and post-war Turkish newspapers.
page 236
page 237
page 238
page 239
One of the pages of footnote citations for the relevant sub-section on the Special Organization:
page 245
History is kind of like playing poker. Some hands are stronger than others; some sources are stronger than others. I do not post this to convince any Turks. Only to show other Greeks that even arguing with an atypical sample of the Turkish population that is English speaking, better educated, etc., over historical issues is pointless.
page 236
page 237
page 238
page 239
One of the pages of footnote citations for the relevant sub-section on the Special Organization:
page 245
History is kind of like playing poker. Some hands are stronger than others; some sources are stronger than others. I do not post this to convince any Turks. Only to show other Greeks that even arguing with an atypical sample of the Turkish population that is English speaking, better educated, etc., over historical issues is pointless.