View Full Version: Israel used phosphorous bombs

Greek Turkish Affairs Forum > Breaking NEWS... > Israel used phosphorous bombs


Title: Israel used phosphorous bombs


Thermopyles - October 22, 2006 08:28 PM (GMT)
JERUSALEM (AP) — The Israeli army dropped phosphorous bombs against Hezbollah guerrilla targets in Lebanon during a war there this summer, an Israeli official said Sunday, confirming Lebanese allegations for the first time.
Until now, Israel had said it only used the weapons — which cause severe chemical burns — to mark targets or territory, the Israeli daily Haaretz reported.

But last week, Cabinet minister Jacob Edery confirmed during a parliamentary query session that Israel had used the weapons during August fighting against Hezbollah, his spokeswoman, Orly Yehezkel, said. Edery was speaking on behalf of Defense Minister Amir Peretz, she said.

"The Israeli army holds phosphorous munitions in different forms," Haaretz quoted Edery as saying. "The Israeli army made use of phosphorous shells during the war against Hezbollah in attacks against military targets in open ground."

Edery did not specify where or against what types of targets the phosphorous bombs were used.

Edery said international law does not ban the use of such weapons. However, many international human rights groups, including the Red Cross, have pushed to ban phosphorous weapons.

During the war, the Lebanese government accused Israel of dropping phosphorous bombs.

Israel's defense minister said Sunday that air force flights over Lebanon would continue because arms smuggling to Lebanese guerrillas has not stopped.

Amir Peretz, in remarks at Israel's weekly Cabinet meeting, accused the Lebanese government of failing to carry out its obligations under a U.N. cease-fire to keep weapons from reaching Hezbollah.

"As long as the resolution isn't implemented, there is no other choice," he said, referring to the U.N. resolution that ended Israel's month-long summer war with Hezbollah.

Peretz spoke after the U.N. peacekeeping force in Lebanon termed the overflights a clear violation of the U.N. cease-fire resolution.

He accused the Lebanese government of failing to prevent Hezbollah from receiving arms from its Syrian and Iranian backers.

"The accumulating intelligence in our hands points to a rising effort to transfer arms," and so "the legitimacy for overflights increases," Peretz said.

The Aug. 14 cease-fire calls on both sides to respect the U.N. boundary drawn in 2000 after Israel ended its 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon.

Israel says it has no choice but to conduct flights across that line because arms continue to flow to Hezbollah and because of the guerrilla group's continued armed presence in southern Lebanon. Under the resolution, the region must become a weapons-free zone.

Up to 15,000 Lebanese army troops and an equal number of U.N. troops have been assigned to patrol southern Lebanon. Last week, Maj. Gen. Alain Pellegrini, leader of the U.N. peacekeeping force, criticized Israel for sending its jets over the area.

Peretz said the U.N. force was "designed to operate against Hezbollah, not Israel


http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-10...on_x.htm?csp=24

Thermopyles - October 22, 2006 08:32 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
Phosphorus weapons cause chemical burns and the Red Cross and human rights groups say they should be treated as chemical weapons.

The Geneva Conventions ban the use of white phosphorous as an incendiary weapon against civilian populations and in air attacks against military forces in civilian areas.

Hospitals

Mr Edery says he confirmed during a parliamentary session last week on behalf of Defence Minister Amir Peretz that the weapons were used in fighting.

"The Israeli army made use of phosphorous shells during the war against Hezbollah in attacks against military targets in open ground," he said.

No information was given on when, where or how the shells were used.

Lebanon had accused Israel of using the weapons but at the time Israeli officials said they were only for marking.

Lebanese President Emile Lahoud said in late July: "According to the Geneva Convention, when they use phosphorous bombs and laser bombs, is that allowed against civilians and children?"

Doctors in hospitals in southern Lebanon had said they suspected some of the burns they were seeing were being caused by phosphorous bombs.

Israeli forces said the arms used in Lebanon did not contravene international norms



Nice to see this admission after they deny using these in the first place. These are horrible weapons. Like the red cross sais, these are chemical weapons. I hope the bastards pay for using them... Fackers...

saladin - October 22, 2006 09:36 PM (GMT)
Sad thing is that, officially they are not chemical weapons so the armies using them can claim they are within Geneva protocols. Yes, it is true, all people who authorize and use them should burn in the hell of their religion.

D.E.A - October 23, 2006 01:39 PM (GMT)
Nothing is going to happen to them we all know that....During the Afgan war there were rumors that mini tactical nukes were used..In fact there were measures that showed higher than normal radiation.Did you see anything happening?During the Nato-Serbian war a lot of "nasty" weapons were used did you see a leaf moving?..Come on guys...Treaties are for those who lost a war...

Thermopyles - October 23, 2006 11:11 PM (GMT)
I get your point, you are not incorrect. However, it didn't seem like that after WWI & WWII...

KOKORO - October 25, 2006 05:03 PM (GMT)
same as us troops use phosfor bombs agains insurgents in iraq too.

but at the and media is controled by the powerful one. so we learn them later.


as now iraq is quite they say . but nearly civil war started.

also in lebanon. jews are the new germans.


Lord - November 20, 2006 09:02 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
Sad thing is that, officially they are not chemical weapons so the armies using them can claim they are within Geneva protocols. Yes, it is true, all people who authorize and use them should burn in the hell of their religion.



+1

123-t - June 23, 2007 04:10 PM (GMT)
death --> hatred --> cohesive actions --> unity ?

123-t - June 24, 2007 05:42 PM (GMT)
Does this and possibly other actions, that might lead to certain feelings in different people, maybe happen with a certain ulterior motive or a hidden agenda ?

Otherwise, one might declare this as the specific usage of might without thoroughly examining what possible consequences this could have and how these consequences could eventually harm, for example the maintenance of power.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree