I think it is maybe hard to follow but i suggest to ban also fanatics who show their real views in other forums with radical posts.

All of ous active posters knew what i mean and i don't give a cent about interferences from digeni or else about false-faced comments towardspseudo-free speech what in truth is just defamation and lies.

We don't need no liars or cowards who show elsewhere their true faces and mime the innocent in here with splitted tongues...


The mods knew who i mean and who start to show their real intentions in this forum too...and if you want that our forum doesn't become a junk like WAFF etc. (where some of our forumers are active) then beware about what is going on...


And if you don't act some members will ! Maybe not radical but you will face another wind in here.
No threat just a little view into the future.

To be honest Kiz, and I can assure you that Lord has the same opinion, I don't really care what they do in other forums as long as they behave according to our principles in here, plus that I would be more conciliatory if I were you when using such expressions about a member like Digenis... WCF will never be WAFF, and you know what I mean, since some of the active posters you mention behave well in here because we care and protect... I don't say you have no right, you have 100%... I can't recall Digenis ever starting a problem in here, actually he is contributing like a few do, thus he enjoys the respect of the majority in WCF...

PS. When serious accusations, please speak with evidence, i.e. give examples, names, links

Dear Kiziroglu,

We simply cannot blame people for their deeds in other forums. First there is a technical reason, we cannot monitor our members' acts in other forums. Secondly structural reason, we are not a party, or fraction, or sect that imposes certain sanctions on its members. Third ethical reason, it's not and should not be our task to monitor our members, prepare intelligence reports etc. All forum members are bound only and only by our forum rules and invisionfree reguations.

On the other hand, we all have information about our members' acts outside, and this greatly affects our relations, our impression about relevant persons, and even the way we reply the posts by these people. Nevertheless, as an admin my primary consideration is the WCF rules. And I strongly encourage all members to do the same.

Mod-Admin team is well-informed about the distress about certain members. And these certain members will face to harsh consequences in case they go further and further and attempt to convert this place into another forum, specifically WAFF.

Regards

Kizir, I visit other forums and meet many members of WCF, and I can asure you that -IMO- they express the same opinions as here.
Don't worry mate.

Modus, if anything bad comes into my consideration, I'll let you know.

At first i didn't mention digenis as one as the trouble makers but as one who expressed his, in my view, wrong opinion how to treat this issue.

But like i wrote the active posters knew who i mean without using names.
And above i also mentioned the problem with the monitoring but i have to say that many use the same nicks in the circle of military/defence forums that are known to people who are interested in that direction.

Hakan abi simdiye kadar her konuda sana inandigim gibi sorunda da tabikii sana hine inaniyorum.

Ok Kiz, my mistake... ;)

It just crossed my mind a certain Turkish member that is extremely more harsh in another forum, but no worries, he is taken care accordingly there...
He had been banned most of the times by turkish mods, because he spoilss the turkish image, lol, even if this place is a brodel anyways..

I don't know why Kizir mentioned my name. I have indicated in the past that I am NOT "D1GENIS" (or whichever way he spells it) on that other forum. I used to post there with the SAME username (digenis) over a YEAR ago, and anyone is free to search and retrieve my postings.

But Kizir is missing the point (which modus clearly expresses). You cannot fault people for actions elsewhere, nor can you bring your issues with them here.

When you enter a temple and see a person you have fought in the past (in the street), how do you react to him? Do you bring the fight into the temple? Respect your surroundings, as this forum is worth respecting.

http://s7.invisionfree.com/worldconflictsf...?showtopic=2721

yes we see...it already started again...


:damn:

Kizir,

What exactly do you object to in that thread? He is clearly expressing the opinion that Turkey should not enter the EU. Did he insult anyone? Did he "flame bait"? Or should we censor the guy because you don't agree with his position?

I got your PM as well, and I still can't see how I came up in discussion. I am neither an admin nor a moderator. I don't have any more authority here than you or any other member. The way you "win" on this forum is by using compelling arguments, and not by dictating your position.

So threating us with war is just the common attitude here ?
Well if that is our argumentation basis then lets change the forum to WAFF II.






And i didn't write to you like to an admin but about what you as a normal poster wrote. But again its not the main issue here.

Kizir,

Where did you see him "threating (you) with war"? Supporting the veto, "political and military integration and tight unification", or expressing that there is a "danger of Turkey entering" is certainly not a threat.

Even if he did express what you claim, why shouldn't he be allowed to? Your GOVERNMENT officially has a THREAT OF WAR (casus belli) in case Hellas extends territorial waters. So why object if anyone suggests the same against your country?

The point here is that you are trying to dictate what can be discussed in this forum. So long as nobody uses insulting language I will defend their right (as best I can as a member) to express their views. Interestingly enough, I do not even agree with Pythea's position (although I agree with Papadopoulos').

And then that picture...i bet you can add 1 and 1


So a fair solution...well

Only if some view isn't presented with insulting words it doesn't mean that it isn't unmoral, unethical and illegal.

Goebbels was a master of rhetoric speech without using any primitive slang and still his words were pure evil and not to tolerate!

kizir, do you regard the sollution turkey has achieved THROUG WAR, a more ethical?

I just propose an answer with the same means. :)

and why don't you post in the thread? I have analysed my thoughts there. If you disagree, confront them there.

Pytheas should have been banned months ago. But Lord protects him all the time. Since pricks like him (pitious) and Hades are favoured here, it is time to take membership into consideration and maybe to leave greeks and some naive turks to eachother and hit the road. himm I will already be banned in a few hour time so no problem but this banning will be a double standard of the stupidest and grandest kind as that heinous SOB (you know whom) stays and barks on. Turkish mods should have been more vigilant. Everytime i have criticized Pitious, Hades and Digenis were in the scene. yeah whatever. Hakan these guys have ruined the forum

Listen bubba, you can leave this place any time you like, you are just one click away...

PS. For calling names you get 20% increase on your warn level, please go ahead and make my day... :D