Title: Greece To Ask US for Two Arleigh-Burke Destroyers
Description: officialy
Pytheas - June 14, 2005 12:32 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE ("Bota99";p="7630") |
Greece To Ask U.S. for Two Arleigh-Burke Destroyers
Posted 06/13/05 09:11 By PERICLES N. ZORZOVILIS, ATHENS DefenseNews.com
 USS Lassen DDG82 pictured
Less than three years after the retirement of the Themistoclis, the last Charles F. Adams-class guided missile destroyer, the Hellenic Navy is ready to officially request two newer vessels from the U.S. Navy.
Navy officials have prepared and will soon send a letter of request for a pair of used Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers under a government-to-government agreement, said Navy Capt. Stefanos Gikas, a spokesman for the Ministry of Defense here. Details about schedule, cost, transfer conditions and weapons would need to be worked out.
“The response of the U.S. administration in the letter of request will be the decisive factor for the implementation of the program,” a high-level Hellenic Navy official said. “What can be said at this initial stage is that the number of the ships should eventually increase to three or four; only at this force level would the introduction of a highly capable and complicated weapon system be worth the initial investment.”
Greece also is asking the United States for four Osprey-class mine-warfare ships and a number of P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft. “All these requests will be managed in the framework of the Greek-U.S. Defense and Industrial Cooperation agreement, which governs the military relations of the two allies,” Gikas said.
The destroyers, which carry the Aegis weapons system, are far more capable than anything in Greece’s current fleet. Adm. Panagiotis Chinofotis, chief of the Hellenic National Defense General Staff, said the Burkes would improve Greek and NATO capabilities by:
• Increasing the interoperability of the Greek military and NATO allies.
• Giving Greece a tactical ballistic missile defense capability, thereby allowing the country to participate more actively in similar allied efforts.
• Strengthening NATO’s southeast region, where hot spots and increasing asymmetric threats have drawn more and more alliance attention over the last decade.
• Helping Greece participate in allied missions overseas.
Chinofotis emphasized that “the transfer will also signal the expansion of the Hellenic-U.S. cooperation in the armaments field and the strengthening of the bonds between the two navies, which are more than 100 years old,” he said.
The transfer of the Burkes also may affect the Hellenic Navy’s effort to buy new frigates, the service’s largest program. A proposal to buy one ship with an option for a second is being included in the preliminary drafts of the next five-year unified armaments procurement plan — known as the 2006-10 EMPAE.
The frigate effort will replace the corvette program that was canceled because of excessive costs in November 2002. Some 588 million euros ($722 million) had been planned for the corvettes in 2006-10.
“The picture will become less obscure when the formal process for the 2006-10 EMPAE starts,” the Navy official said. “Until then, everything is a matter of speculation and alternate options.” But he said Greece was determined to maintain a fleet of 14 major surface combatants.
The Navy now operates four Hydra-class (German MEKO-200HN) and 10 Elli-class (Dutch Standard) multipurpose frigates. Six of the Ellis are getting a midlife upgrade under a 386 million euro contract awarded in 2003 to Thales Naval Nederland, Hengelo, the Netherlands, and Hellenic Shipyards, Skaramanga, Greece. A midlife upgrade for the Hydras will begin in 2010. • |
The point is...
Are these good or bad news?
Damn... too complicate...
Efeler - June 14, 2005 02:36 AM (GMT)
As far as I remember, at least Taiwan and Australia were ahead in line for any, any possible Burke transfer.
| QUOTE |
| But he said Greece was determined to maintain a fleet of 14 major surface combatants. |
With this in mind, it seems 2 existing frigates (of the 10 Kortenaer/Standard and 4 Meko's) will have to be decommissioned to make room for the Burke's and keep the fleet at 14. Most likely 2 of the Kort's will be scrapped at first. Which seems odd since these 2 would probably be from the batch of 4 that just transferred (with no Phalanx and probably not part of the 6 to be modernized). However, for Greece to continue maintaining a large fleet of Kortenaer's it definately requires at least 1 or 2 parts hulks to support the ships. Compare with Turkey which also received a total of 10 Perry's but seperated 2 for parts. As time goes on and reality sinks in (I don't think the Dutch have any Kort's left to give), the Greek navy is in urgent need for parts sources and may be considering cannibilizing at least 2 of the Kort's to maintain the rest. What better then to replace these with... possibly Burke's. ;) :drink2:
boulio - June 14, 2005 01:48 PM (GMT)
i would worry about the know frigates first efeler than the kortnerers.
GREEK-AIRBORNE - June 14, 2005 04:03 PM (GMT)
@Boulio, Greece has decomission Knox Frigates some years ago. ;)
digenis - June 14, 2005 04:24 PM (GMT)
I am sure that Boulio was referring to the Knox's being used by Turkey. Well, Turkey has a number of spare Knox hulls. But let's not forget that Hellas received an AMPLE supply of spares (including engines) for the Standard frigates.
cameleon1975 - June 14, 2005 06:23 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Efeler @ Jun 14 2005, 04:36 AM) |
| However, for Greece to continue maintaining a large fleet of Kortenaer's it definately requires at least 1 or 2 parts hulks to support the ships. Compare with Turkey which also received a total of 10 Perry's but seperated 2 for parts. As time goes on and reality sinks in (I don't think the Dutch have any Kort's left to give), the Greek navy is in urgent need for parts sources and may be considering cannibilizing at least 2 of the Kort's to maintain the rest. |
I don't think that we need that much spare frigates in order to mantain the Kortanears fleet operational.We have shipyards capable to repair whatever damage they could take.But surely having spare parts is droping cost and repair time to minimum.
Pytheas - June 14, 2005 06:36 PM (GMT)
:attention:
What about talking a bit about Arleigh Burkes? :angry:
cameleon1975 - June 14, 2005 06:51 PM (GMT)
LOL.You are right. :friendship:
DirtyBird - June 14, 2005 08:33 PM (GMT)
Just to bring up as a discussion point, why in the world would the HN need such a capability in the Aegean when it can buy more medium to high altitude SAM batteries then the TAF can shake a stick at and spread them across the Aegean, there by creating the same effect as a couple of floating platforms. Would this not be more cost effective method of providing fleet AAW capability? If the HN were indeed to purchase these frigates, which I doubt will include Tomahawks, they will be extremely high value targets for the TAF and TN, and I would assume some sort of counter threat would have to be establidhed in th form of shore based ASM's or longer ranged sub based ASM's like the Popeye Turbo.
Pytheas - June 14, 2005 08:38 PM (GMT)
That's a question I also question myself... Therefore my comment at my first post... I'm not sure if it is wise to have these giants in the Aegean...
boulio - June 14, 2005 08:39 PM (GMT)
Because they would be great assets if need be concerning defending shipping lanes and tranports if operations were shifted to cyprus.
cameleon1975 - June 14, 2005 08:41 PM (GMT)
We need them to provide anti aircraft cover for our nacal battlegroups.An Aegis frigate is a tough target and it operates together with subs,other ships and airforce.So its gonna take something more than '' buying just some missiles'' in order to take her out......
Efeler - June 14, 2005 09:25 PM (GMT)
These ships would probably focus on covering and blocking the Crete-North Africa corridor. Essentially stopping any shipping from the western Med./Atlantic to Turkish ports, in essence blockading all Turkish searoutes to the outside world not including the Suez canal.
The Turkish answer will most probably be... [drum roll]... the construction of 4 AIP subs with Popeye subsurface after the last Gur class is completed, plus 2-4 destroyers of most likely Spruance class for 2006 after. Long ranged land based SSM's are also in the works (check Israeli LORA, Chinese S-300 anti-ship version, and other domestics...)
cameleon1975 - June 14, 2005 09:32 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Efeler @ Jun 14 2005, 11:25 PM) |
| The Turkish answer will most probably be... [drum roll]... the construction of 4 AIP subs with Popeye subsurface after the last Gur class is completed, plus 2-4 destroyers of most likely Spruance class for 2006 after. Long ranged land based SSM's are also in the works (check Israeli LORA, Chinese S-300 anti-ship version, and other domestics...) |
Hm,so you gonna spend about 10 billion euro to counter our AAW frigates....I'd love to see where you gonna get that money from,and I guess E.U. economical observors too. :D
SCALP_Naval - June 14, 2005 09:52 PM (GMT)
I don't think that the Burke's size is going to be so much of a problem in the Aegean. If the Navy believes that the LSV A374 Promitheas (Etna class-bigger than the Burke) is safe in the Aegean, then the 100+ missile (SM-2 and ESSM) carying Burkes will be ok!
Efeler - June 14, 2005 10:45 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| Hm,so you gonna spend about 10 billion euro to counter our AAW frigates....I'd love to see where you gonna get that money from,and I guess E.U. economical observors too. |
Ten billion! No way. The 4 subs should cost less then 2 billion max. Considering the Preveze/Gur's costed only about $180 million each and the only difference is AIP! The 2 secondhand Spruance (already offered as 1 sale, 1 grant), should be no more then 200 million weapons included. The SSM's and possibly Popeye subsurface should be less then 2 billion in total. So we're more realistically looking at less then 4 billion. A Burke costed $1 billion brand new... I wonder how much the US will be asking IF they do deside to sell... :attention:
| QUOTE |
| I don't think that the Burke's size is going to be so much of a problem in the Aegean. If the Navy believes that the LSV A374 Promitheas (Etna class-bigger than the Burke) is safe in the Aegean, then the 100+ missile (SM-2 and ESSM) carying Burkes will be ok! |
True, Burke is not that huge of a ship. Only about 15m longer then the Perry. However it may have trouble passing through the Corinth canal as discussed in another thread... ;)
U-BOOT - June 15, 2005 03:19 PM (GMT)
Why would they need to pass through Corinth in the first place?The main base of the Navy is in Salamis in the Athen's bay...I don't think the Turkish nave will try to operate in the Ionian sea anyway.If it does,it will have no air cover,supposing it will manage to circumnavigate Peloponnese so to pose threat to western islands.
Efeler - June 15, 2005 04:30 PM (GMT)
True, it's not that big of a deal U-boot. Just a small impediment to deployment issues in case the ship needed to be transfered quickly from the Ionian to the Aegean and back. All other Greek ships are capable of passing. Also is there not any Greek naval presence in the Ionian? (I believe there is a small Turkish naval contingent at the Pasalimani naval base in Albania... :sneaky: )
mavrogenides - June 15, 2005 04:34 PM (GMT)
The only port which is able to support these huge monsters is only the naval base in crete anyway....
And to use these ships in the adria is pure waste of ressources....
cameleon1975 - June 15, 2005 05:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Efeler @ Jun 15 2005, 06:30 PM) |
| Also is there not any Greek naval presence in the Ionian? (I believe there is a small Turkish naval contingent at the Pasalimani naval base in Albania... :sneaky: ) |
LOL.I don't think that the Albanians will let you use that naval station in case of a war with Greece.Even if they do,a couple of F-16s or even some Apaches would be enough to take care of it.I don't think though that the Turkish navy has any interest to operate in the Ionian sea.
digenis - June 15, 2005 05:29 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Efeler @ Jun 15 2005, 11:30 AM) |
| Just a small impediment to deployment issues in case the ship needed to be transfered quickly from the Ionian to the Aegean and back. All other Greek ships are capable of passing. Also is there not any Greek naval presence in the Ionian? (I believe there is a small Turkish naval contingent at the Pasalimani naval base in Albania... :sneaky: ) |
I doubt there will be a Turkish military presence in the Ionian, but in any case, there are Hellenic Navy assets often present in both Kerkyra (Corfu) and Patra.
ChrisCRTS - June 15, 2005 06:30 PM (GMT)
SCALP is right they are not just big they are also armed to the teeth.
As for the AA in the islands covering the whole Aegean. :damn:
Lets say 10 islands with 100 missiles makes 1000 missiles.
10 Radars and fire control systems
ASM missiles to protect the islands from enemy ships
soldiers to protect the island from enemy special forces
Etc. Etc.
WHERE are we going to found so many personel?
cameleon1975 - June 15, 2005 08:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Efeler @ Jun 14 2005, 04:36 AM) |
As far as I remember, at least Taiwan and Australia were ahead in line for any, any possible Burke transfer.
|
I thought Australia was going to buy Aegis systems fot the new ships they are going to build.What do they want the Burkes for?I say screw the Aussies and let the Chinese take Taiwan back! ;)
That way we will be on top of that list! :drink2:
GREEK-AIRBORNE - June 15, 2005 10:41 PM (GMT)
Arleigh-Burke is a good military Ship. with two of those in the aegean (one in the North and one in South) we will have a vary good A/A defence in Aegean plus the missiles in the Islands. I will say we need one more (3 in total) so we can have it operate in the open sea betwean Rhodes and Cyprus
(ENIAIOS AMYNTIKOS XWROS- gia na min ksexniomaste)
exocet - June 16, 2005 05:58 PM (GMT)
THEY ARE PERFECT FOR US BELIEVE IT OR NOT.
DONT QUSTION ANYMORE THE NESSECITY PRESENCE OF THE MOST FORMIDABLE DESTROYERS IN THA NAVAL HISTORY OF THE WORLD TO THE GREEK NAVY!!!!
REGARDLESS THE MANCREW DEMANDS AND SIZE!!!!
STOP ARGUING AND QUESTIONING NOW!!!
WE GO BURKES!!!!! :thumbsup:
beleg - June 18, 2005 07:11 AM (GMT)
While you are at it exocet get a few Los Angeles class subs.. :thumbsup:
Nutuk - August 25, 2005 05:20 PM (GMT)
Is there already some news about the Aegis destroyers? What was the US reply on the Greek request of the Arleigh Burkes? Yes or No?
cameleon1975 - August 27, 2005 09:49 AM (GMT)
They said that they will consider our request.....
Don't think that we are going to get an answer anytime soon.
ChrisCRTS - August 27, 2005 06:55 PM (GMT)
They needed 2 years to let the Germans give us 44 M-113!
I think we going to wait a bit longer for two Burkes! :P
cameleon1975 - August 28, 2005 07:29 AM (GMT)
This moment we can't afford new AAW frigates anyway.The americans know it.So they'll wait until we have the money and start looking around.I guess that when we start evaluating offers for new designs (German,French,etc...)they will offer the Aegis for lets say half price of new ones. ;)
robust - August 28, 2005 01:16 PM (GMT)
I wouldn't be too optimistic about Aegis Destroyers. My reasons are: first, Taiwan requested Aegis/Burkes ships long time ago, then they had to settle with Kidds at the end...Taiwan needed these ships urgently, and USA is the very close ally of Taiwan in that region, still Taiwan could not get ships approved for sale. Secondly, Burke class ships will be very expensive for Greece if they are released with full weapon systems, Aegis System alone cost 300-400 million dollars...Each Burke ships costs over 1 billion dollars...How much Greece is willing to pay for these ships?...Third, USA will never approve original Aegis system for sale, except downgraded versions. Example, Spain, Norway got modified, simplified Aegis "alike" systems. Fourth, Greece still has to work out SM-2 release problem from USA...Turkish Navy has the same issue of course... and the last, USA NAvy is still commited to Burke/Aegis ships, not sure if they are planning to retire any of them in near future...
mavrogenides - August 28, 2005 02:03 PM (GMT)
The US-navy has confirmed that all of the flight I Bourkes will be offered for sale....
Greece is officially on the "custom list".
Allthough I really hope we will go as fast as possible for some F-124/Horizon/FREMM and not for these huge monsters like the Bourkes.
Nutuk - August 28, 2005 03:47 PM (GMT)
Well one thing is sure, if Greece gets the Burkes with Aegis it would be a big slap in the face of the Turkish navy and a real source of concern.
The Spanish F100
Pytheas - August 28, 2005 03:52 PM (GMT)
The annual edition "Amyntiki Biblos 2005-2006" says that the Americans will Propably give us the Burkes but too expensive... close to a new european AAW Destroyer, so propably we won't get them...
They also say that the request is a part of the whole diplomatical game we play with the Americans... (greece military hub of the area, etc...) :dunno:
Personally I would like more some Horizons, or FREMMs... :thumbsup:
Efeler - August 28, 2005 03:54 PM (GMT)
I would say the release of any Burke's would be dependent on the progress of the new DDX platform which is expected to be operational in the USN by 2013. Also about 20 Burke Flight IIA's are still under construction until about 2011. Thus if Greece were to eventually acquire Burke's (which would definately be no more then the oldest Flight I's) the time frame would most likely be in the vicinity of 2010 once the Flight IIA project comes to an end. Note that the USN has a tendency to get rid of ships no younger then 20 yrs old, in which the Flight I's will roughly be that age by 2010.
Spain received the SPY-1F version of the Aegis radar. As Robust said, it is probably a detuned version of the current SPY-1D's used in the Burkes, with the Flight IIA's expecting to upgrade to SPY-1D(V). Another more realistic possibility for Greece is to acquire the non-VLS versions of the Ticonderoga cruisers with the earlier SPY-1A's. Basically a Kidd-class with Aegis. Then again these are huge ships with a high manpower requirement. At the end of the scale, Spruance would be out of the question as the last/best equipped ships are reserved for Turkey (Greece rejected the earlier non modernized Spruances which were offered to them about 4 years).
It is reported that the Kidd's that Taiwan just began receiving after a 3-4 yr overhaul could have been retrofitted with VLS. Again, something that could be considered with the older Tico's (which Turkey should also consider). In my opinion the wait period for a Burke would be at least 2009-10, with a possible Tico option instead for 2007-08. Surplus Aegis ships (even the oldest ones) have never been transfered as of yet to any other nation and this notion reminds me of us Turkish forumers debating whether there would be a possibility of F-15A/B/C's transfered to Turkey...
Nutuk - August 28, 2005 05:10 PM (GMT)
Someone on the forum said the Turkish TF2000 frigate project is stalling because of the US refusal of delivering the Aegis radar, if that is the case what is keeping Turkey of using the Thales APAR radar which is more or less doing the same function?
orko_8 - May 20, 2006 06:48 PM (GMT)
Any developments about the issue lately?
DouriosYpnos - May 22, 2006 07:22 AM (GMT)
@orko
Yap.. we will built 6 new vessels so i see no room for the Burkes :)
cameleon1975 - May 22, 2006 08:41 AM (GMT)
Its about a year since the Us said that they would consider our request.Its still too soon for a final decision..... :lol:
beleg - May 22, 2006 09:54 AM (GMT)
Which version of FREMM does Greece show interest in? The L.A. version with Scalp Naval looks cool imo.