Title: Nikaty Wanders Right Into A Pickle
Nikaty - March 30, 2006 12:44 AM (GMT)
Name: Lady Montague
Plot Big or Small: Smallish
Plot Idea: Okay, Nikaty decides to wander off. And she wanders directly into Skah terra. Now, of course, a peace treaty is in effect, and this creates, well, a little problem. See, while Fal wouldn't declare the treaty dissolved because a pup unknowingly wandered into the lands, somebody from the Amarth, obviously, would have to fetch her. However, Fal would be in the mood for a little maniacal revenge, since Aro caused the recent passing of a packmate among other things. So, here's what we were thinking: Aro comes in to collect his wandering daughter, however the Skah by this point are holding Nikaty captive, and Fal tells Aro he must beg for Nikaty's return, threatening to keep Nikaty and raise her against the Amarth (or so he hopes *evil grin*) if Aro refuses to humble himself. Now, Aro can either do as requested and take Nikaty home, and leave with the peace treaty still intact. But perhaps he'd launch an attack instead, fighting for his daughter's return. Of course, that would quite likely dissolve the treaty right then and there. Of course, Aro could declare it dissolved anyway because of the Skah holding Nikaty hostage. So it's sort of an open-ended plot with several different possible conclusions.
Wolves Needed: Arohkien, Nikaty (me), Fal (and probably Kisu as well), plus all the Skah in the immediate area would likely be involved.
Anything Else Needed: N/A
Fal - March 30, 2006 12:47 AM (GMT)
*Maniacal* Aye.
And Aro, if you're game, this could turn into another match.
Kisu - March 30, 2006 02:41 AM (GMT)
OooooOOOO *is a bit intrigued*
Ikari - March 30, 2006 03:26 AM (GMT)
I highly doubt it would happen, after all Aro went through to get the treaty enacted. Besides, the Skah are not the type to hold hostages, revenge or not its not their way, and i think a few members would have problems with keeping a pup hostage.
Kiowa - March 30, 2006 04:47 AM (GMT)
-smirks- If the Skah want a war, I say let them have their war. –pats Kiowa- Perhaps I shall delay her death a mite bit longer…-grins- This should prove to be…interesting…should spice things up a great deal and finlay bring about what has been brewing for a long time. Skah pack Vs. Amarth pack...
Arohkien - March 30, 2006 04:59 AM (GMT)
If the skah want a war, I say bring it, another round of getting pounded I suspose-smirks- Well see how things go from this plot. Really get things heated up against the packs, and finally, the brewing anger of the Amarth shall be released.
Plar - March 30, 2006 01:26 PM (GMT)
And Plar can kick some tail! Maybe eat a few...not literally...maybe so.
*malicious grin*
I likey!
Ciprian - March 30, 2006 01:27 PM (GMT)
Well, Cip does have bottled feelings...and he is extrem-o loyal to the Skah.
BRING IT ON!
Nikaty - March 30, 2006 03:06 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Ikari @ Mar 30 2006, 03:26 AM) |
| I highly doubt it would happen, after all Aro went through to get the treaty enacted. Besides, the Skah are not the type to hold hostages, revenge or not its not their way, and i think a few members would have problems with keeping a pup hostage. |
There is a point there. Although it's because of the nature of the Skah that I brought the...oh so...gung-ho Gilligan down from Fal threatening Nikaty's life to just threatening to raise her as a Skah. I mean...the Skah just wouldn't kill a pup...LOL
Although, 'twould be interesting if a big war developed. lol
Kiowa - March 30, 2006 10:27 PM (GMT)
I could see it within the Skah's personality to take revenge for what the Amarth did when they stole their cubs. After all, they can only sit by and take some much laying down before they will fight back.
Fal - March 30, 2006 11:02 PM (GMT)
My point exactly Kristen. ;) You can't expect to poke the bear and not get bit.
Kiowa - March 30, 2006 11:06 PM (GMT)
lol, let's just hope the poker of the bear does not bite back too hard :P
Aiko - March 31, 2006 12:14 AM (GMT)
Would the bear bite still if the poker bribed him with honey?
;)
Fal - March 31, 2006 12:45 AM (GMT)
I dunno. Pokers against bears. Le'ss see.
And egh. Honey gross.
Aiko - March 31, 2006 12:50 AM (GMT)
Keno - April 4, 2006 05:23 AM (GMT)
Okay we've sort of altered things a little so that taking Nikaty hostage makes sense (meaning is okay for the Skah to do). A pup will be created that comes into Skah which Nikaty attacks and kills, making the Skah angry. So then it won't be totally unskah for the Skah to take action against Nikaty. lol