Okay, I'm wondering how to deal with a situation. In the Skah pack meeting, Keno and Snowcone both said something that Bethlen later responded to. The problem? Well, other things had happened. Let's take Snowcone for example: Snowcone said something about what happened being her fault. Nearah left Snowcone's side in the next post and then Keno tried to talk her out of feeling like it was her fault. Then Bethlen posted in response to Snowcone's comment, but situated it so that it looked like it was before Nearah left or Keno came to her, and Snowcone has already responded to those things. Keno had a similar experience in that he asked Khu and Bethlen pretty much the same question, Khu answered and Keno then went over to Snowcone before Bethlen posted an answer. Bethlen has now posted an answer but it seems as if the answer was before Keno actually went to Snowcone.
How do people deal with these types of situations? Should I have Snowcone and Keno just keep going from where they were at, or should they go back and respond to Bethlen as if Bethlen didn't respond until the other things happened?
-Snowcone/Keno/Razor (and the deceased Vengence)
Well ... at one of the old places I RP'd at the starters of the topic set up a post order. Basically, everyone who's going to be in that topic will post, and then the order they posted in is kept for the rest of the thread. Like if it's a pack meeting, give everyone time to come in and once you feel you have enough members, the topic starter posts again - completing the circle. Then, watever ever order people posted in continues, it keeps everyone in line.
If i new person enters - they join the list. If i person leaves, they leave the list. ooh, lets use examples!!
TOPIC STARTER
wolf 1
wolf 2
wolf 3
wolf 4
TOPIC STARTER
wolf 1
wolf 2
wolf 3...
but then if someone new comes along it continues as:
wolf *new*
wolf 4
TOPIC STARTER
wolf 1
wolf 2
wolf 3
wolf *new*
wolf 4 ...
Of course, this can fall apart if people aren't active. And I might be a little late to use on your thread.