View Full Version: Stargate Sg-1 Cancelled, Atlantis Renewed?

Cult Tv Boards > Stargate SG1 & Atlantis > Stargate Sg-1 Cancelled, Atlantis Renewed?



Title: Stargate Sg-1 Cancelled, Atlantis Renewed?


Phillip Culley - August 21, 2006 10:50 PM (GMT)
According to Gateworld:

QUOTE
The future of Stargate is in question today, as SCI FI Channel has cancelled the long-running Stargate SG-1, Multichannel News reported today and a GateWorld source has confirmed. The news regrettably follows the airing of the show's milestone two-hundredth episode on Friday.

Stargate Atlantis, meanwhile, has been renewed for a fourth season, with the network hoping to see that the spin-off series can stand alone, according to a source.


Full story here

Bloody typical - just as the series was relaunching itself and standing firm without RDA, they cancel it.

Bastards :mad:

Crichton Kicks - August 21, 2006 11:25 PM (GMT)
At first glance I'm frankly amazed at this decision. On the other hand, any network that would prefer a pointless BSG prequal to a new Firefly series is capable of all kinds of stupidity.

If they have to cancel anything they should cancel Eureka because so far that's going absolutely nowhere.

I think they're dropping a real clanger with this one.

jamiearmour - August 22, 2006 12:47 AM (GMT)
Are all studio execs f***ing insane?

Oh wait a minute, the answer was in my question wasn't it?

Bloody idiots, they deserve to be dragged down sunset strip and stoned till they die.
:mad: :guns: :mad: :guns: :mad: :guns:

Who's with me?

Crichton Kicks - August 22, 2006 06:49 AM (GMT)
Nice of them to align the announcement with the 200th episode celebrations.

Clear evidence that Sci-Fi are indeed evil :rolleyes:

F*ckers.

TV Crazy - August 22, 2006 07:55 AM (GMT)
American TV Networks are evil :devil: - they cancel all my favourite TV shows - Buffy, Angel, Firefly, Alias, Dead Like Me, Tru Calling, and many more - and now SG-1 just when it was doing so well, i'm really looking forward to S10 with the Atlantis crossover and 200, and i was just getting into the Ori storyline - there are some very mean things i want to say, but shouldn't here.

SG-1 has had 10years, i thought it would have been cancelled a long time ago - so well done for going this long.

At least we still have Atlantis (hopefully)

Ems :sad:

prophecy girl - August 22, 2006 09:29 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
SCI FI issued the following statement on Aug. 21: "SCI FI Channel is proud to be the network that brought Stargate SG-1 to its record-breaking 10th season. Ten seasons and 215 episodes is an astounding, Guinness World Record-setting accomplishment. Stargate is a worldwide phenomenon. Having achieved so much over the course of the past 10 years, SCI FI believes that the time is right to make this season their last on the channel. SCI FI is honored to have been part of the Stargate legacy for five years, and we look forward to continuing to explore the Stargate universe with our partners at MGM through a new season of Stargate Atlantis."


<_<

Bakhesh - August 22, 2006 09:36 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
Don't count Stargate SG-1 out just yet. Though SCI FI Channel has cancelled the long-running series (story), the show's producers are hard at w**k looking for a new outlet for the story to continue, executive producer Robert C. Cooper told GateWorld exclusively.

"As far as the future I can't comment yet because nothing has been confirmed," Cooper said. "What we want to emphasize is that the franchise is not dying. SG-1 will go on in some way. We're just not ready to announce how."

A formal announcement from the studio and the network is expected later this week.

Cooper also emphasizes that, though emotions are running high among Stargate fans who have just learned the news, it is important to keep the show's ratings strong throughout the remainder of its run on SCI FI. "What's most important is that fans don't take out their frustration with SCI FI by not watching," he said. "In fact, what they need to do is watch both SG-1 and Atlantis LIVE and make sure the ratings stay strong.

"That helps prove to other outlets that might be interested in SG-1 that the show is still as strong as we think it is."

Could Stargate SG-1 find its way to yet another network in 2007? Or might the SG-1 team be headed for a TV movie, mini-series, direct-to-video feature ... or the big screen? Stay with GateWorld for the latest developments.

Stargate SG-1 Season Ten continues with all-new episodes this Friday at 9 p.m. Eastern/Pacific on SCI FI, followed by Stargate Atlantis at 10 p.m.!


from gateworld

Apparently 200 had a 36% ratings jump too, so you never know.

laughitupfuzzball - August 22, 2006 09:50 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 22 2006, 12:25 AM)
At first glance I'm frankly amazed at this decision. On the other hand, any network that would prefer a pointless BSG prequal to a new Firefly series is capable of all kinds of stupidity.

If they have to cancel anything they should cancel Eureka because so far that's going absolutely nowhere.

I think they're dropping a real clanger with this one.

Totally Eureka seemed very Outer Limits to me when I caught it last night but with more constrictions :blink: hardly likely to build a following is it.

They seem hell bent on cancelling their most popular shows :mad: and the decision to renew Atlantis without SG-1 is a weird one too.

willowroolz - August 22, 2006 10:22 AM (GMT)
Try as I might I've never really been able to get into the show (managed to get to season 5 before grinding to a halt), but I'm still quite shocked and very disappointed by this, especially from a wider genre tv perspective. Apart from anything else it worries me how they will treat BSG in the future.

Nothing Sci Fi does surprises me anymore :(

jamiearmour - August 22, 2006 11:07 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Bakhesh @ Aug 22 2006, 10:36 AM)
QUOTE
Don't count Stargate SG-1 out just yet. Though SCI FI Channel has cancelled the long-running series (story), the show's producers are hard at w**k looking for a new outlet for the story to continue, executive producer Robert C. Cooper told GateWorld exclusively.

"As far as the future I can't comment yet because nothing has been confirmed," Cooper said. "What we want to emphasize is that the franchise is not dying. SG-1 will go on in some way. We're just not ready to announce how."

A formal announcement from the studio and the network is expected later this week.

Cooper also emphasizes that, though emotions are running high among Stargate fans who have just learned the news, it is important to keep the show's ratings strong throughout the remainder of its run on SCI FI. "What's most important is that fans don't take out their frustration with SCI FI by not watching," he said. "In fact, what they need to do is watch both SG-1 and Atlantis LIVE and make sure the ratings stay strong.

"That helps prove to other outlets that might be interested in SG-1 that the show is still as strong as we think it is."

Could Stargate SG-1 find its way to yet another network in 2007? Or might the SG-1 team be headed for a TV movie, mini-series, direct-to-video feature ... or the big screen? Stay with GateWorld for the latest developments.

Stargate SG-1 Season Ten continues with all-new episodes this Friday at 9 p.m. Eastern/Pacific on SCI FI, followed by Stargate Atlantis at 10 p.m.!


from gateworld

Apparently 200 had a 36% ratings jump too, so you never know.

So, what are we to look forward to?

A network jump? Hardly unprecedented, but rare.

TV movies? Hmmmmm. The B5 movies were kind of hit and miss weren't they?

Books and audio adventures? Hey it was good enough for Doctor Who!

All I can keep thinking is; Poor Claudia Black, Ben Browder and (now) Morena Baccarin. Those three must think they're cursed now :tear:

The last watcher - August 22, 2006 12:32 PM (GMT)
B*stards..... <_<

SG1 and Atlantis are just about the only currently active shows I watch nowadays....and now they've gone and trashed one of them..... :cry:

I'm trying to get into Eureka......but its not the same........ :(

Jamie - save me some of those stones! :guns:

Crichton Kicks - August 22, 2006 05:06 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Aug 22 2006, 12:07 PM)
QUOTE (Bakhesh @ Aug 22 2006, 10:36 AM)
QUOTE
Don't count Stargate SG-1 out just yet. Though SCI FI Channel has cancelled the long-running series (story), the show's producers are hard at w**k looking for a new outlet for the story to continue, executive producer Robert C. Cooper told GateWorld exclusively.

"As far as the future I can't comment yet because nothing has been confirmed," Cooper said. "What we want to emphasize is that the franchise is not dying. SG-1 will go on in some way. We're just not ready to announce how."

A formal announcement from the studio and the network is expected later this week.

Cooper also emphasizes that, though emotions are running high among Stargate fans who have just learned the news, it is important to keep the show's ratings strong throughout the remainder of its run on SCI FI. "What's most important is that fans don't take out their frustration with SCI FI by not watching," he said. "In fact, what they need to do is watch both SG-1 and Atlantis LIVE and make sure the ratings stay strong.

"That helps prove to other outlets that might be interested in SG-1 that the show is still as strong as we think it is."

Could Stargate SG-1 find its way to yet another network in 2007? Or might the SG-1 team be headed for a TV movie, mini-series, direct-to-video feature ... or the big screen? Stay with GateWorld for the latest developments.

Stargate SG-1 Season Ten continues with all-new episodes this Friday at 9 p.m. Eastern/Pacific on SCI FI, followed by Stargate Atlantis at 10 p.m.!


from gateworld

Apparently 200 had a 36% ratings jump too, so you never know.

So, what are we to look forward to?

A network jump? Hardly unprecedented, but rare.

TV movies? Hmmmmm. The B5 movies were kind of hit and miss weren't they?

Books and audio adventures? Hey it was good enough for Doctor Who!

All I can keep thinking is; Poor Claudia Black, Ben Browder and (now) Morena Baccarin. Those three must think they're cursed now :tear:

I'm not so sure about a network jump. Thus far SG1's lived it's television life on cable. It's too much of a risk to any of the major networks I'd have thought. Great numbers on Sci-Fi/Showtime aren't exactly great numbers on NBC/CBS.

Realistically you'd be looking for something like the USA Network to pick it up, but with The 4400 and The Dead Zone, they look to have a pretty full slate already.

Probably the best bet is either a movie, or a sci-fi channel mini series.

It's a strangely timed announcement. Effectively they've based the decision on the ratings for only a quarter of the season. I'll be interested to see what happens should the current ratings spike persist, especially if they go back above those for Atlantis.

What amazes me is that Eureka's pulling in that many more viewers than either SG1 or Atlantis. How FFS?? :shrug:

Crichton Kicks - August 22, 2006 05:13 PM (GMT)
Interesting bit from Digital Spy;

QUOTE
Stargate: SG-1 will end next May after ten years on the air, it has been confirmed.

Ratings for the cult show - the longest-running sci-fi series in US TV history - dropped off from 2.6 million to just 2 million viewers in recent months.

Mark Stern, the Sci-Fi Channel's evp of original programming, insisted that the decision was not based on ratings, however. "We're actually going out on a high note," he told Variety, adding that the early announcement would give producers sufficient time to wrap up any remaining loose ends.

Several cast members from SG-1 will transfer to spinoff series Stargate: Atlantis, which has been renewed for a fourth season in 2007.


Wonder which characters they're on about? I'd like it to be Mitchell & Vala but it wouldn't surprise me if they keep peddling Jackson and Carter out :rolleyes:

melian - August 22, 2006 06:19 PM (GMT)
I think I heard somewhere that this will be the last season of Dead Zone, so there may be an open slot over on USA ;)

As for Eureka, although it will never even come close to SG1 in my mind, I can see why many people may watch this and not SG1. I think many people may be put off SG1 just for the very fact that it is so long running, they may feel that there is no point in starting to watch a program that has already run for so many years.

Sad, but often true :(

TV Crazy - August 22, 2006 09:01 PM (GMT)
Eureka looked interesting, but i didn't feel like watching it, and certainly won't be if it's replacing SG-1.

As for characters moving over i think that they don't have an archeologist on Atlantis (i think), so Daniel might go, so hopefully that would mean Vala would follow (they're great fun), but i don't see a place for Mitchell, Carter or Teal'c as they have a number of scientists, air force people and Aliens from their part of the galaxy with them. Hopefully they'll all do guest spots from time to time, and maybe this TV Movie/miniseries might happen.

Maybe another network will pick it up, but it's doubtful considering its had 10 seasons already, they probably wouldn't think it worth it. I mean Angel had 5 seasons and was cancelled, there were so many petitions, fan sites and attempts to try to get it renewed on another network, but it didn't do much.

Fingers crossed.

Ems :)

Crichton Kicks - August 22, 2006 09:23 PM (GMT)
Regarding The Dead Zone;

QUOTE
The future of The Dead Zone
Posted: March 7, 2006, 22:16:45

The Dead Zone, will there be a season 6? Well, there have been some rumors flying around so I checked with a source I have that is close to the show and here is what’s happening:


The show is not cancelled, not yet. It's officially on hiatus, and the final word on its pick-up or cancellation likely won't come until Season Five (11 new episodes) finishes its run this summer. USA Network, which airs the show (which is produced by Lionsgate and Paramount), is still holding onto its option for a sixth season and will likely make its final decision then.

The situation came about by shooting all 23 episodes of Seasons Four and Five continuously last year. Normally, the show and the actors would've gone back into production about five months later. But the decision to wait to air the Season Five episodes this summer pushed back the timeframe that USA Network wanted to back its decision -- after all the new episodes have aired. Season Four's ratings were fantastic -- the show was the number five show on all of cable and, along with The 4400, helped USA Network dominate Sunday evenings. There is every reason to believe that this tandem will succeed again this summer, and that they could both be renewed again. The overall tightening at NBC Universal won't last -- they'll be back on top in no time. They've got a lot of great stuff in the pipeline, from NBC to USA and Sci-Fi.

But this means that, for the moment, the show's actors are not under contract and can join new series pilots or anything else they choose. But nothing is certain yet, and even if an actor were to take another job it wouldn't preclude them from still appearing on the show. Jennifer Finnigan did this last season, and many actors do it all the time.

But rumors of The Dead Zone's demise are far from true at this point in time. Everything will depend on how the show performs this summer.


So, there you have it. Don't give up on The Dead Zone just yet, OK?


I did a little digging on the ratings for The Dead Zone's fifth season. They're still strong; The Dead Zone and The 4400 are still coming in as the top two original series airing on Sunday nights (I presume they mean on cable). In fact a couple of the recent episodes have actually improved over the numbers from last year.

If I had to guess I'd say that TDZ will be coming back next season, alongside The 4400 (see below), Monk and Psych.

Also, re: The 4400;

QUOTE
'THE 4400' RETURNS FOR SEASON FOUR
Released by USA


'THE 4400' RETURNS FOR SEASON FOUR

The Emmy-nominated Series Returns to USA with 13 Original Episodes for Summer 2007

LOS ANGELES - August 22, 2006 - USA Network has ordered 13 one-hour episodes of the Emmy-nominated and critically-acclaimed hit series THE 4400, it was announced today by Jeff Wachtel, USA's executive vice president, original programming. The series, which has garnered an Emmy nomination, will return to USA Network in summer 2007 with production scheduled to begin in Vancouver in early 2007. THE 4400 is produced by CBS Paramount Network Television in Association with Sky Television, Renegade 83 and American Zoetrope for USA Network.

THE 4400 premiered on USA as a limited series in July 2004 as the highest-rated and most-watched new series premiere ever on a basic cable network, and still continues to perform as a ratings powerhouse for the network. THE 4400 received three Emmy nominations in its first season, including Outstanding Miniseries, as well as Outstanding Writing and Cinematography for a Miniseries or Movie.

"This show continues to thrive creatively from year to year," said Wachtel. "We're looking forward to another season filled with intriguing characters, unique twists and incredibly suspenseful storylines."

THE 4400 explores the travails of the 4400 people who all at once returned in a ball of light to Earth; though the returnees had not aged physically, many of them reappeared with dramatic abilities ranging from enhanced reflexes to precognition. NTAC (National Threat Assessment Command) is the government agency responsible for keeping track of the returnees and investigating all things related to the 4400.


On the characters that could possibly transfer across to Atlantis; logically you could take Daniel for the reasons outlined above, and possibly Carter. You could imagine the Carter and McKay characters bouncing off each other (which would probably mean the end of Zalenka).

Looking at it from a cost point of view, those two would probably be two of the more expensive cast members to retain, which makes it possibly more cost effective to bring across Browder and Black. Wouldn't surprise me if Beau Bridges was retained as well. That way they could still keep hopping back to the SGC and have a familiar face.

Phillip Culley - August 22, 2006 09:40 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
(which would probably mean the end of Zalenka).


They'd better bloody not get rid of him - he's one of my favourite characters! :)

Crichton Kicks - August 22, 2006 09:58 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Aug 22 2006, 10:40 PM)
QUOTE
(which would probably mean the end of Zalenka).


They'd better bloody not get rid of him - he's one of my favourite characters! :)

Mine as well, but you know that's exactly the kind of sparring relationship they'd love to have between McKay and Carter :rolleyes:

I really hope they don't take Carter across.

Dan Brown - August 23, 2006 02:38 PM (GMT)
A real shame, I haven't seen any of season 8 and 9, so I don't know anything about Vala or Mitchell, but I loved the film when I saw it at the cinema when I was 8 and then saw a trailer for SG-1 and saw that the actors had all changed and I wasn't too sure about the series but when I saw it on Channel 4 for the first time it was brilliant and I watched it ever since. Though every season, apart from recently when I've prefered DVDs to watching them on TV and I'm still waiting for the price drop of season 8 to £29.99.

Ten years is a fantastic goal for any show, and I'm pleased they've got this far its just a shame it has to end because the Stargate has been with me for so much of my life and so have these characters. I just hope they transfer one of my favourite ever TV/film characters ever, Dr. Daniel Jackson over to Atlantis and hoperfully that show will run as long as SG-1 did.

A way to dampen the 200th episode celebrations anyway you look at it.

The best way I think the last episode could end is with SG-1 travelling to Atlantis and getting trapped!!! Then we could have Stargate Atlantis: SG-1.

willowroolz - August 23, 2006 02:44 PM (GMT)
Good news on The Dead Zone front, though, by the sounds of it :thumbsup:

Crichton Kicks - August 23, 2006 05:06 PM (GMT)
Good news for The 4400, but I'm reserving judgement on The Dead Zone until it's all official. It wouldn't be the first stupid decision if they cancelled it. Not even the first stupid decision this week :rolleyes:

Steve, WTF's going on with that AV? :lol:

TV Crazy - August 30, 2006 09:34 AM (GMT)
A campaign has been started at Save Stargate SG-1 if anyone is interested.

Ems :)

Dan Brown - August 30, 2006 02:19 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (TV Crazy @ Aug 30 2006, 09:34 AM)
A campaign has been started at Save Stargate SG-1 if anyone is interested.

Ems  :)

I don't know, if I have the energy this time around when Farscape was cancelled I put alot of effort in with e-mails and letters, but this time round it just doesn't seem so bad. The show has ran for along time, and they will get the chance to end it properly I hope, it just seems like the show has ran its course and maybe it is time for it to finish...we still have Atlantis, whereas with Farscape I WAS ANGRY...basically they had XXXXXX XXXX and XXXXX and the show didn't feel finished, as well as hearing that they were promised a fifth season, which was then cut in half and refused.

I don't think the campaign is going to be as viral and as effective as the Save Farscape one.

Crichton Kicks - August 30, 2006 03:23 PM (GMT)
Dan,

I've edited your post for spoilers. Bear in mind that this is the SG1 board, and people might not have seen Farscape yet, or at least not all of it. Me included :p

Dan Brown - August 30, 2006 03:25 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 03:23 PM)
Dan,

I've edited your post for spoilers. Bear in mind that this is the SG1 board, and people might not have seen Farscape yet, or at least not all of it. Me included :p

Sorry........ :blush:


Crichton Kicks - August 30, 2006 03:32 PM (GMT)
I'll let you off with a virtual slap on the wrist this time...... :p :lol:

Phillip Culley - August 30, 2006 03:32 PM (GMT)
I don't think it's worth the effort.

Unlike other shows which have been cancelled in their prime (like Farscape), SG-1 has had an exceptional innings. It's the longest-running (episode-wise and season-wise) US-made sci-fi series, it's made its mark in the sci-fi annals, and if it ends now we won't feel like we've missed out.

It's a shame that they've managed to relaunch themselves successfully with BB (both of them :)) and CB and could well have gone on for many more years, but given what they've done I'm happy to let them bow out gracefully.

The only thing that concerns me is that most of this season had already been written and filmed before the announcement, so I just hope they can turn things around and actually end the series - especially as from what I gather this season was being made with the intention of having a season 11 (ironically this is the first time they did this since coming to Sci-Fi - every other season was made with the intention of being the last! :))

laughitupfuzzball - August 30, 2006 04:27 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Dan Brown @ Aug 30 2006, 04:25 PM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 03:23 PM)
Dan,

I've edited your post for spoilers. Bear in mind that this is the SG1 board, and people might not have seen Farscape yet, or at least not all of it. Me included :p

Sorry........ :blush:

Rightly a slap on the wrist for spoilers but slap on the wrist for you too James for not having finished it yet :lol:

Crichton Kicks - August 30, 2006 05:05 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (laughitupfuzzball @ Aug 30 2006, 05:27 PM)
QUOTE (Dan Brown @ Aug 30 2006, 04:25 PM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 03:23 PM)
Dan,

I've edited your post for spoilers. Bear in mind that this is the SG1 board, and people might not have seen Farscape yet, or at least not all of it. Me included :p

Sorry........ :blush:

Rightly a slap on the wrist for spoilers but slap on the wrist for you too James for not having finished it yet :lol:

Drat....erm, I was using myself for illustrative purposes only....? :unsure: :lol:

Re SG1, I agree with Phillip's post. It's disappointing in that they've planned beyond this season, but it's had a great run, so it's hard to be completely devastated. I hope it continues, but, now that the disappointment's sunk in I won't be devastated by any means if that's it.

willowroolz - August 31, 2006 07:19 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 06:05 PM)
I was using myself for illustrative purposes only....? :unsure: :lol:

:lol: :lol:

Sounds painful :ponder:

Want some r2 Farscape dvds, James? :lol: ;)

Crichton Kicks - August 31, 2006 09:35 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 08:19 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 06:05 PM)
I was using myself for illustrative purposes only....?  :unsure:  :lol:

:lol: :lol:

Sounds painful :ponder:

Want some r2 Farscape dvds, James? :lol: ;)

Hmm, now if I admit that I've already got all the episodes I'll probably land myself in deeper water won't I......? :unsure: :lol:

willowroolz - August 31, 2006 09:39 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 10:35 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 08:19 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 06:05 PM)
I was using myself for illustrative purposes only....?  :unsure:  :lol:

:lol: :lol:

Sounds painful :ponder:

Want some r2 Farscape dvds, James? :lol: ;)

Hmm, now if I admit that I've already got all the episodes I'll probably land myself in deeper water won't I......? :unsure: :lol:

Think Ed Harris in The Abyss and you're in the right vicinity :lol:

Crichton Kicks - August 31, 2006 09:49 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 10:39 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 10:35 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 08:19 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 06:05 PM)
I was using myself for illustrative purposes only....?  :unsure:  :lol:

:lol: :lol:

Sounds painful :ponder:

Want some r2 Farscape dvds, James? :lol: ;)

Hmm, now if I admit that I've already got all the episodes I'll probably land myself in deeper water won't I......? :unsure: :lol:

Think Ed Harris in The Abyss and you're in the right vicinity :lol:

Hmm,

Ok. I've got them, but borrowed them out? That way I'm completely dependent on them being returned before I can watch season 4, and therefore I can't really be blamed personally for still not finishing the series.

Yes, yes that's it....... :unsure:

willowroolz - August 31, 2006 09:54 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 10:49 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 10:39 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 10:35 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 08:19 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 06:05 PM)
I was using myself for illustrative purposes only....?  :unsure:  :lol:

:lol: :lol:

Sounds painful :ponder:

Want some r2 Farscape dvds, James? :lol: ;)

Hmm, now if I admit that I've already got all the episodes I'll probably land myself in deeper water won't I......? :unsure: :lol:

Think Ed Harris in The Abyss and you're in the right vicinity :lol:

Hmm,

Ok. I've got them, but borrowed them out? That way I'm completely dependent on them being returned before I can watch season 4, and therefore I can't really be blamed personally for still not finishing the series.

Yes, yes that's it....... :unsure:

Yes, yes, you loaned them to me but now you can have them back :lol:

Crichton Kicks - August 31, 2006 10:05 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 10:54 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 10:49 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 10:39 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 10:35 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 08:19 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 06:05 PM)
I was using myself for illustrative purposes only....?  :unsure:  :lol:

:lol: :lol:

Sounds painful :ponder:

Want some r2 Farscape dvds, James? :lol: ;)

Hmm, now if I admit that I've already got all the episodes I'll probably land myself in deeper water won't I......? :unsure: :lol:

Think Ed Harris in The Abyss and you're in the right vicinity :lol:

Hmm,

Ok. I've got them, but borrowed them out? That way I'm completely dependent on them being returned before I can watch season 4, and therefore I can't really be blamed personally for still not finishing the series.

Yes, yes that's it....... :unsure:

Yes, yes, you loaned them to me but now you can have them back :lol:

Really? Must I?.......:lol:

willowroolz - August 31, 2006 10:43 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 11:05 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 10:54 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 10:49 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 10:39 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 31 2006, 10:35 AM)
QUOTE (willowroolz @ Aug 31 2006, 08:19 AM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Aug 30 2006, 06:05 PM)
I was using myself for illustrative purposes only....?  :unsure:  :lol:

:lol: :lol:

Sounds painful :ponder:

Want some r2 Farscape dvds, James? :lol: ;)

Hmm, now if I admit that I've already got all the episodes I'll probably land myself in deeper water won't I......? :unsure: :lol:

Think Ed Harris in The Abyss and you're in the right vicinity :lol:

Hmm,

Ok. I've got them, but borrowed them out? That way I'm completely dependent on them being returned before I can watch season 4, and therefore I can't really be blamed personally for still not finishing the series.

Yes, yes that's it....... :unsure:

Yes, yes, you loaned them to me but now you can have them back :lol:

Really? Must I?.......:lol:

:whip: :lol:

TV Crazy - August 31, 2006 05:43 PM (GMT)
I do agree that SG-1 has had it's best now, i was disappointed when RDA left, and to me it hasn't been the same, i still really enjoy it, it's one of my favourite shows and think there is so much more they could tell, but maybe it is Atlantis' turn, lets just hope Sci-fi gives it a decent chance.
As long as they end it well (and not be evil with a cliffhanger like Angel), then i'll be happy, and an SG-1 movie wouldn't be a bad thing either.

Ems :)

TV Crazy - October 11, 2006 09:47 PM (GMT)
Sorry to double post.

According to gateworld, there will be 2 direct to DVD SG-1 movies - one relating to the ending of the series and the other relating to time travel.

Ems :)

prophecy girl - October 12, 2006 09:08 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
SCI FI Channel's original series Stargate SG-1 will wrap up its 10-year run this spring, but that's not the end of the saga. Executive producer Brad Wright told TV Guide that MGM has granted a green light, and enough money, to produce two movies, most likely for DVD.

The first film will tie up most of the finale's loose threads. "It's the climax of the Ori storyline," Wright said, and will be written and directed by executive producer Robert Cooper. The second film, written by Wright, will involve time travel, and both projects should debut in the fall of 2007.

Though no deals are signed, SG-1's stars are said to be "very eager" to continue, Wright added. "They're not big-budget [films] by any definition, but for us it's pretty good," he said. "As we've proven over the years, just give us little more money and we can make pretty good television or DVDs."


sci fi wire.com

Bakhesh - October 12, 2006 10:40 AM (GMT)
Coolio. I was worried that the end of the ori storyline would seem really rushed. :thumbsup:




Hosted for free by InvisionFree