View Full Version: Latest Trek Movie Rumour

Cult Tv Boards > Movies > Latest Trek Movie Rumour



Title: Latest Trek Movie Rumour


Bakhesh - December 14, 2005 09:43 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
WILLIAM SHATNER to return for new "STAR TREK" movie?

CanMag.com reports that Captain Kirk might be returning to the bridge of the Enterprise for the next "Star Trek" film. Not only that - he'll be joined by Patrick Stewart's Captain Picard and Scott Bakula's Johnathan Archer, of "The Next Generation" and "Enterprise", respectively.

The site claims that the idea to set the next "Trek" movie as a prequel, with the action centering on the students of the Starfleet Academy, has been trashed. Instead, they're considering doing a sequel that will be set in the "Mirror" Universe - which we've seen in both "Star Trek" and "Enterprise" before - which will make it possible for several of the 'captains' to team up. (After all, there's no rules/no continuity restrictions in the 'Mirror' universe).

"Apparently Shatner was in talks to do a guest role on Enterprise, but it didn’t w**k out. Why? Apparently he wanted a) more money B) would rather do Trek films. Solution? The ideas for the episode of the “Enterprise” episode he was going to do will now be incorporated into a movie. Yep, Captain kirk’s back", says the site. "It’ll be Shatner, Captain Picard and maybe Archer".

Let's just hope this new "Trek" movie is better than the last one - "Star Trek : Nemesis"!


from AICN.

Can't see this happening to be honest. The fans would like it, but it wouldn't bring in the casual movie goer.

Phillip Culley - December 14, 2005 01:23 PM (GMT)
Were this to pass, it would be the final nail in Trek's coffin....

Then again, given this was presumably a story idea for Enterprise S4, the fact it's utter fan-pandering doesn't surprise me...

The Trek TPTB really do need to sit down and look at the new series of Doctor Who - the right way to resurrect a series with far too much continuity and back story for it's own good, yet make it accessible to the mainstream audience!

Number Six - December 15, 2005 11:38 AM (GMT)
Do the words "clutching" and "straws" mean anything to them, I wonder.

Bloody awful idea. Anyway, why not bring in Sisko? After all, there were more DS9 episodes set in the mirror universe than TOS or Enterprise

Phillip Culley - December 15, 2005 03:31 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Number Six @ Dec 15 2005, 06:38 AM)
Anyway, why not bring in Sisko? After all, there were more DS9 episodes set in the mirror universe than TOS or Enterprise

If the original trailer for Enterprise was anything to go by, Sisko doesn't even exist...

prophecy girl - December 16, 2005 10:31 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
Trek Rumors Denied?

Sy Fy Portal reported that a Paramount Pictures source denied rumors that the studio is developing a Star Trek film that will feature Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, Capt. James T. Kirk and Capt. Jonathan Archer together.

"You're going to see this a lot right now," the unnamed source told the site. "Without anything announced, you're going to see speculation everywhere. But unless you hear it from someone actually involved, don't believe it, because it likely isn't true."

The Canmag.com Web site reported the rumor that William Shatner is one of the former Star Trek captains who would appear in a proposed new Trek movie set in the "mirror" universe. Citing an anonymous source, the site reported that a script is floating around for a proposed new movie.

"Paramount has only asked for one script, and yes, they are deciding whether or not that's the direction they want to go," the source said. "Erik [Jendresen's] script met with mixed reaction, but it has nothing to do with the quality. It has more to do with disagreements among those who are in decision-making capacities as far as it [Star Trek] is concerned. There are no other ideas on the table at this time."


:shrug:

Calculon - December 18, 2005 06:39 PM (GMT)
As flav says 'don't belive the hype'

prophecy girl - January 11, 2006 11:00 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
Stewart: Too Old For More Trek?
Patrick Stewart told the WENN Web site that Paramount may want him to reprise his Star Trek role of Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, but that he may be too old should a new Next Generation movie get off the ground.


what does that sat about kirk? :rolleyes:

Dan Brown - February 3, 2006 08:06 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (prophecy girl @ Jan 11 2006, 11:00 AM)
QUOTE
Stewart: Too Old For More Trek?
Patrick Stewart told the WENN Web site that Paramount may want him to reprise his Star Trek role of Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, but that he may be too old should a new Next Generation movie get off the ground.


what does that sat about kirk? :rolleyes:

Well Fatty Boy Riker has let himself go recently so the jury is still out to whether the bridge of his new ship will be able to hold his weight.......I don't think they'll be a problem with Picards age though.....shouldn't he be an admiral by now?

Janeway was a Captain less time and became an admiral......Kirk even took an admiral job for a while....I just don't see why Picard wouldn't...he seems the type to accept a promotion....

Crichton Kicks - February 3, 2006 05:57 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Daniel Brown @ Feb 3 2006, 08:06 AM)
QUOTE (prophecy girl @ Jan 11 2006, 11:00 AM)
QUOTE
Stewart: Too Old For More Trek?
Patrick Stewart told the WENN Web site that Paramount may want him to reprise his Star Trek role of Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, but that he may be too old should a new Next Generation movie get off the ground.


what does that sat about kirk? :rolleyes:

Well Fatty Boy Riker has let himself go recently so the jury is still out to whether the bridge of his new ship will be able to hold his weight.......I don't think they'll be a problem with Picards age though.....shouldn't he be an admiral by now?

Janeway was a Captain less time and became an admiral......Kirk even took an admiral job for a while....I just don't see why Picard wouldn't...he seems the type to accept a promotion....

Janeway got her promotion on a technicality though. She was deemed to be less dangerous behind a desk than captaining a starship ;)

Number Six - February 7, 2006 12:52 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Feb 3 2006, 07:57 PM)
QUOTE (Daniel Brown @ Feb 3 2006, 08:06 AM)
QUOTE (prophecy girl @ Jan 11 2006, 11:00 AM)
QUOTE
Stewart: Too Old For More Trek?
Patrick Stewart told the WENN Web site that Paramount may want him to reprise his Star Trek role of Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, but that he may be too old should a new Next Generation movie get off the ground.


what does that sat about kirk? :rolleyes:

Well Fatty Boy Riker has let himself go recently so the jury is still out to whether the bridge of his new ship will be able to hold his weight.......I don't think they'll be a problem with Picards age though.....shouldn't he be an admiral by now?

Janeway was a Captain less time and became an admiral......Kirk even took an admiral job for a while....I just don't see why Picard wouldn't...he seems the type to accept a promotion....

Janeway got her promotion on a technicality though. She was deemed to be less dangerous behind a desk than captaining a starship ;)

And it's not quite so easy to get lost behind a desk :innocent:

I notice that Kate Mulgrew is appearing in "The Exonerated" at London's Riverside, alongside Danny Glover (Lethal Weapon).

Wonder if she can get through it without barking "report" at every opportunity :lol:

Dan Brown - February 8, 2006 09:30 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Number Six @ Feb 7 2006, 12:52 PM)
QUOTE (Crichton Kicks @ Feb 3 2006, 07:57 PM)
QUOTE (Daniel Brown @ Feb 3 2006, 08:06 AM)
QUOTE (prophecy girl @ Jan 11 2006, 11:00 AM)
QUOTE
Stewart: Too Old For More Trek?
Patrick Stewart told the WENN Web site that Paramount may want him to reprise his Star Trek role of Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, but that he may be too old should a new Next Generation movie get off the ground.


what does that sat about kirk? :rolleyes:

Well Fatty Boy Riker has let himself go recently so the jury is still out to whether the bridge of his new ship will be able to hold his weight.......I don't think they'll be a problem with Picards age though.....shouldn't he be an admiral by now?

Janeway was a Captain less time and became an admiral......Kirk even took an admiral job for a while....I just don't see why Picard wouldn't...he seems the type to accept a promotion....

Janeway got her promotion on a technicality though. She was deemed to be less dangerous behind a desk than captaining a starship ;)

And it's not quite so easy to get lost behind a desk :innocent:

I notice that Kate Mulgrew is appearing in "The Exonerated" at London's Riverside, alongside Danny Glover (Lethal Weapon).

Wonder if she can get through it without barking "report" at every opportunity :lol:

Kate Mulgrew........ in a film.....quickly RUN for the hills!

Getting back to the topic.....I think with the next generation crew really we have got to their Star Trek: The Unidiscovered Country point (basically they are too old to be conceivable to run a ship unless the new film is named Star Trek: Geriatrics In Space), they have reached their shelf-life and its time again to move on....now a film involving the Enterprise crew?

No that'll never happen....so I think back to the drawing board. Trek for the moment is dead. I liked Enterprise, I really did but it is time for a rest, Paramount should try something new.

How about they get Joss Whedon to develop a sci-fi Tv show for them about a crew 500 years in the future possibly starring Nathan Fillion? Now that I would want to see!

Crichton Kicks - March 1, 2006 05:57 PM (GMT)
Taken from Trektoday;

QUOTE
"Les Moonves hates all things Sci-Fi," a former Paramount assistant claimed, explaining that he did not think the new head of CBS was at all interested in reviving Star Trek.

Since the Viacom-CBS split last year, CBS has controlled the television franchise, and Rick Berman's assistant Doug Mirabello said that there is not likely to be a new Star Trek series or film for quite some time. In an interview at Sci Fi Pulse, Mirabello suggested that the franchise needs an entirely new creative team.

The comments were quoted in Dreamwatch after appearing at the Something Awful forums, where Mirabello claimed that the script written by Erik Jendresen for a potential eleventh Star Trek movie had been rejected and that despite Patrick Stewart's recent comments that he had had discussions about a possible future Next Generation film, "It’s more likely that some executive had a casual conversation with him and brought up some hypotheticals which he ran with when some reporter asked him about Star Trek."

Mirabello admitted that it was possible "Paramount is planning something huge and keeping us out of the loop" but he did not believe that Stewart would do another Star Trek movie "unless they paid him Professor X money" - a reference to Stewart's paycheck for the X-Men series.

The Berman assistant said that Star Trek had been successful in the 1980s but "never really evolved with the times." He mentioned an incident where a director went to the producers to "tell them he was ashamed to direct the episode where our crew turned into lizard people" (presumably Voyager's "Threshold"). The Enterprise finale "was one of those where you’d go down to the stage and see people shaking their heads while reading the script."

With UPN and the WB merging, and with Moonves allegedly having expressed disinterest in science fiction - though executives at CBS gave Brannon Braga's Threshold the green light this season - Mirabello was not optimistic about a future for Star Trek, which he said might be for the best, to give the franchise "some time off, and a cool new approach."


I'm sorry, but look at the source. Why the f*ck would Paramount let Berman anywhere near Star Trek again ?? Of course they're not telling him about anything......:rolleyes:

Actually, thinking about it, I'd rather see no new Trek than Trek under Berman again.

W*nker.


Hippy - March 2, 2006 01:44 PM (GMT)
Ditto :rolleyes:




Hosted for free by InvisionFree