View Full Version: Marvel Has New Name, Slate

Cult Tv Boards > Movies > Marvel Has New Name, Slate



Title: Marvel Has New Name, Slate
Description: via sci fi wire site


prophecy girl - September 6, 2005 09:01 AM (GMT)
QUOTE


Marvel, the home of Spider-Man and X-Men, has a new name and 10 new movies in development, Variety reported. With its $525 million debt facility from Merrill Lynch closed, the company is changing its name from Marvel Enterprises to Marvel Entertainment, reflecting its new business producing and financing movies internally without a studio partner.

Along with the Merrill Lynch deal, Marvel struck a deal with Paramount to market and distribute its films for a fee, similar to Lucasfilm's arrangement with Fox, the trade paper reported.

Marvel has identified 10 new characters and groups it will develop as potential feature franchises to produce itself: Captain America, the Avengers, Nick Fury, Black Panther, Ant-Man, Cloak and Dagger, Dr. Strange, Hawkeye, Power Pack and Shang-Chi.

The deal with Merrill allows Marvel to produce films with budgets between $50 million and $165 million. If the first films are successful, Marvel will be able to replenish the facility to produce new movies in development or sequels to hits. Company is hoping to release its first movie by the summer of 2008.

Bakhesh - September 6, 2005 10:25 AM (GMT)
Captain America, the Avengers, Nick Fury :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Cloak and Dagger, Dr. Strange :ponder: :ponder:

Black Panther, Ant-Man, Hawkeye, Power Pack and Shang-Chi. :fear: :no:

prophecy girl - September 7, 2005 08:41 AM (GMT)
nick fury: they can't do worse than the TV film with david hasseloff .......... or can they? :ermm:

Bakhesh - September 7, 2005 08:44 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (prophecy girl @ Sep 7 2005, 08:41 AM)
nick fury: they can't do worse than the TV film with david hasseloff .......... or can they?  :ermm:

...or Captain America with Matt Salinger, or that dodgy 70's Dr Strange.


Not sure how they're going to do an avengers movie. Surely the copyright issues would prevent it.

jamiearmour - September 7, 2005 01:25 PM (GMT)
Why do I think that they will trial the Avengers before Captain America :ponder: Just to see if the character works on screen?

Also there is already an Avengers flick on its way.

From Wizard.

QUOTE
HULK SMASH
Ultimate Avengers debuts at Wizard World Chicago

Craig Kyle and Ken Katsumoto from Marvel Studios and Lions Gate previewed and discussed the upcoming "Ultimate Avengers" full-length DVD to a packed crowd at Wizard World Chicago. Taken right from the first six issues of Ultimates Vol 1, fans were treated to an exclusive clip of the film, featuring the awe inspiring throwdown from Ultimates #4 where the team must battle the Hulk in the streets of New York City.

The clip faded in from black with the Hulk's massive breathing providing the voiceover. Then it the scene cut to the posh NYC restaurant where, if readers can recall, betty Brant was having dinner before an enraged Hulk climbed to the floor where the restaurant was and smashed through the windows. Giant Man quickly entered the scene and smacked the Hulk like a he was crushing a bug, but the Hulk retaliated, knocking Giant Man across several buildings.

Iron Man stepped up next, rocketing his way onto the scene and tossing Hulk into a busy Grand Central terminal. Again, the scene looked as if it was cut and paste directly from the Brian Hitch's w**k.

Next Ultimate Thor appeared amidst a fury of lightning and special effects before cutting to the awe inspiring one-on-one between Captain America and the Hulk. After trading blows for a few seconds the Hulk lets out one final scream and the clip faded to black, again with the massive breaths providing the voice over.

Kyle went on to describe the process behind translating the book to animated film.

"There will be moments in this film where you can literally see it having been cut and pasted panel for panel. There were moments however we had to expand on some things so it's not entirely panel for panel. [But] we did our best."

Kyle went on to describe Hitch's prominent role in developing the movie's look.

"Brian Hitch had a heck of a role. We went to him first and said 'What would your take on this character be?'"

Ken Katsumoto also followed that story is being told from Captain America's point of view and that many supporting characters from the first six issues are involved.

For an in-depth interview with Kyle and Katsumoto and more on "Ultimate Avengers" check out Wizard 168 - on sale August 31st.


Bakhesh - September 7, 2005 02:05 PM (GMT)
Is this a cartoon Jamie? Not heard of it myself.

If they do an avengers movie, they are going to need Thor and Iron Man at least, and there are already movies being developed for them at different studios (not to mention Betty Brants cameo in Spiderman. What is she doing in Avengers anyway?). Captain A would have to be there too, but at least Marvel are doing his movie themselves, so no copyright problems there.

I'm pretty sure that Captain Ameria could w**k quite well on screen. I always thought the comic was pretty decent. It is easy to screw up as well of course, so I'm quite pleased to see Marvel trying to tackle it themselves. Also, you know how patriotic americans can get. Pretty much guaranteed success in the states. It'll be the comic equivalent of Passion of the Christ.

jamiearmour - September 7, 2005 02:58 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Bakhesh @ Sep 7 2005, 02:05 PM)
Is this a cartoon Jamie? Not heard of it myself.

If they do an avengers movie, they are going to need Thor and Iron Man at least, and there are already movies being developed for them at different studios (not to mention Betty Brants cameo in Spiderman. What is she doing in Avengers anyway?). Captain A would have to be there too, but at least Marvel are doing his movie themselves, so no copyright problems there.

I'm pretty sure that Captain Ameria could w**k quite well on screen. I always thought the comic was pretty decent. It is easy to screw up as well of course, so I'm quite pleased to see Marvel trying to tackle it themselves. Also, you know how patriotic americans can get. Pretty much guaranteed success in the states. It'll be the comic equivalent of Passion of the Christ.

It's being touted as a direct to dvd animated movie. One of a series that are in the works already. The company responsible is also w**king on various other marvel films, as well as "a series of sequels" :rolleyes: to the Avengers one, which Avi Arad, has fallen in love with. Should be on release early next year.

The "trailer" that was shown at Wizard world apparently "blew the audience away". Now even taking into account that the audience would have consisted of 100% Marvel fanboys, I'm almost excited about what I've seen and heard.

prophecy girl - September 8, 2005 08:56 AM (GMT)
i don't think they will ever bring hulk in a movie ever again (or they will have to recreate him)

Bakhesh - September 8, 2005 09:33 AM (GMT)
I'm pretty sure that they're are already talking about a hulk sequel. Just hope they keep Ang Lee away from this one. The Hulk is one of my favourite characters, and I'm sure there is at least one decent movie to be had there.


Did you see this one on IGN>

QUOTE
September 7, 2005 - It was recently announced that Marvel Entertainment has secured a $525 million loan package that will allow it to produce 10 films based on its comic book characters, specifically Captain America, the Avengers, Nick Fury, Black Panther, Cloak & Dagger, Dr. Strange, Hawkeye, Power Pack, Shang-Chi and Ant-Man. Paramount will distribute the films, which will carry a price tag somewhere between $50 million-$165 million each.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, "Marvel chairman and CEO Avi Arad said he officially will begin attaching scriptwriters to all 10 projects beginning Wednesday and that, though he has a wish list, he's unsure which movie will be released first."

IGN FilmForce has learned that British filmmaker Edgar Wright is poised to direct Ant-Man. Wright apparently plans on making Ant-Man a comedy.

Neither Wright's reps nor Marvel responded to our inquiries for comment.

Wright wrote and directed the zombie laffer Shaun of the Dead. He also has been linked with the upcoming projects Hot Fuzz and Scott Pilgrim's Precious Little Life.

In the comics, Ant-Man was Dr. Henry "Hank" Pym; he also fought crime under the pseudonyms of Giant-Man, Goliath and Yellowjacket. As The Marvel Database reminds us, Pym discovered a group of subatomic particles and produced two serums from them, one that could reduce someone or something in size and another to restore them.

Testing the serum on himself, Pym was reduced "to the size of an insect. Pym became entrapped in an anthill and was pursued by the ants within. ... Inspired by his experience in the anthill, Pym undertook a study of ants, and theorized that ants communicate through psionic/electrical waves transmitted through their antennae. After months of w**k, Pym succeeded in creating his first 'cybernetic helmet,' which would enable him to communicate with ants through transmitting and receiving psionic/electrical waves. Thinking that someday he might want to use the shrinking potion on himself again, Pym also designed a protective costume for himself."

Pym eventually became a costumed crime-fighter, serving with The Avengers and also marrying (and later divorcing) fellow superhero Janet Van Dyne, a.k.a. the Wasp.


Never really wanted an Antman movie, but if Edgar Wright is doing it, it could be OK. No doubt Simon Pegg will play Hank Pym. :thumbsup:

prophecy girl - September 8, 2005 09:46 AM (GMT)
not sure about a ant size super hero :ponder: but you never know ... i could be interesting :unsure:

Bakhesh - September 8, 2005 10:05 AM (GMT)
Don't forget, he has power over the ant!!

He is just vunerable to any villains who own kettles.

prophecy girl - September 8, 2005 10:27 AM (GMT)
any kind of ants? even the human eating ants? (now that would be useful against the bad guys) :)

Bakhesh - September 8, 2005 12:22 PM (GMT)
Only if you can persuade the bad guys to stand still for a while.

As super powers go, its almost as useless as Aquamans ability to talk to sea creatures. At least Ants live on land (where the majority of crimes are committed)

prophecy girl - September 9, 2005 08:40 AM (GMT)
:ponder: ant man then could end up as a hit man (i mean you sent your ants while the guy is sleeping ... that should do it) :unsure:

Bakhesh - September 9, 2005 08:45 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (prophecy girl @ Sep 9 2005, 08:40 AM)
:ponder: ant man then could end up as a hit man (i mean you sent your ants while the guy is sleeping ... that should do it) :unsure:

either that or a sugar-thief

prophecy girl - September 9, 2005 08:51 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
either that or a sugar-thief


:lmao:

prophecy girl - September 11, 2005 06:13 PM (GMT)
about antman -> Exclusive: Who Might Direct Ant-Man?
First word on the new Marvel movie. -> http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/648/648615p1.html




Hosted for free by InvisionFree