Title: 1.04 Throne For A Loss
willowroolz - June 6, 2004 11:21 AM (GMT)
When a cargo negotiation with the bloodthirsty Tavleks turns into a kidnapping, Moya's crew must race against time to save their shipmate...
melian - June 8, 2004 04:03 PM (GMT)
Favourite line......
John: (arms crossed, still stewing) You shanghai my ass down here and now you want me to lead? Give me one good reason.
Aeryn: Lots of reasons. Land mines. Fire snakes. Razor grass. Night vision snipers, Morlian death spiders...
There is some fantastic John/Aeryn moments in this episode, and I had quite forgotten how many of my favourite lines came from this one, I don't remember liking it that much the first time around ;)
willowroolz - June 10, 2004 08:11 PM (GMT)
I agree: I thoroughly enjoyed it this time around. It's still not the Farscape I know and love - there's definitely a feeling that they hadn't decided what audience they were aiming for at this point, hence the knockabout humour and still-stereotyped D'Argo.
But there is some decent dialogue in here. Zhaan actually comes across really well in this episode, and manages to spring a few surprises. It's kind of strange, looking back at these early episodes, how big a part Rygel is playing in all of them, too. I didn't really remember that.
The music still grates during the episode - again, an indication that they hadn't decided on the tone and feel of the show at that point, which is understandable in such formative stages. It's also the first time they have really got to do some action with pyrotechnics: a scaled down glimpse of things to come.
And the Tavloids - sorry, Tavleks - are pretty cool. The gauntlet is an interesting weapon, and it's nice to know that we'll be seeing them again in the future.
All in all, an episode that's lightweight but fun :)
Persephone - June 20, 2004 09:35 PM (GMT)
Not too much to add I'm afraid. It was okay, some very good lines from Aeryn as Melian has already quoted. Nice blue tint to the foliage :lol:
The gauntlet (don't say Buffy, don't say Ms Post :lol: :lol: :lol: ) erm, interesting weapon :rolleyes:
Phillip Culley - October 15, 2004 11:04 PM (GMT)
This was better than the previous episode, although I'm afraid had I not got the entire season already, I wouldn't be giving the series the attention I'm sure it will deserve. Out of interest, when does the series really get kicked up a gear?
Sorry, I feel I'm being needlessly negative, but unlike other series I'm afraid Farscape still hasn't really gained my attention. Fingers crossed it will improve though (and hopefully I'll speed through S1 :))
Crichton Kicks - October 15, 2004 11:17 PM (GMT)
Before I tuned out of the Beeb transmissions, A Human Reaction was the first episode that I really liked.
willowroolz - October 16, 2004 10:39 AM (GMT)
I felt much the same at this stage when I first watched it, Phillip, because it doesn't feel like it's covering any new ground, and which resulted in me giving up on the series until I caught season 3's Suns and Lovers by accident and found that a quantum leap in the level of quality in all aspects had occurred.
Personally, now I think that things start to improve from 1.07 PK Tech Girl onwards. I view the first season much like that of B5, Stargate etc - there are a few stinkers, a few average and a few corkers, but even in the worst episodes there are hints towards what they were striving for.
Each season has a similar structure, in that they start with several standalone stories, with the big arc kicking in at around mid-season and then dominating until the big multi-episode climaxes.
James is right - A Human Reaction is where the Farscape story really begins, in terms of the ongoing arc. The latter stages of season 1 show marked improvement, culminating in three or four stunning episodes which change the direction of the series completely.
But, even after this very shaky start, it ended up being a show with real balls, and it was uncompromising and inventive right up until the end. There aren't many shows around that can claim that.
Crichton Kicks - October 16, 2004 01:25 PM (GMT)
I remember catching parts of Nerve and The Hidden Memory when they originally aired on BBC2 as well. Unfortunately I didn't see enough of those episodes to win me back. Don't think I've ever seen any of Season 2. The only real reason that you were able to tempt me with the rewatch Steve was because for some unknown reason I picked up the Into the Lion's Den 2 parter on DVD. Even as a non FS fan at the time, and even not knowing what had gone on over the past couple of years, I still thought those episodes were brilliant.
willowroolz - October 16, 2004 02:21 PM (GMT)
Lisa's probably the best person to give a view on it, as this is her first time through and she came to it completely fresh and unbiased.
I think the way I became a fan was probably the best way I could have done it, as I was inevitably comparing it to other shows at the start. Returning to it during season three and seeing the quality, getting drawn into its universe and then going back and watching the first two years from a new perspective worked really well for me.
Crichton Kicks - October 16, 2004 02:28 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (willowroolz @ Oct 16 2004, 03:21 PM) |
| I was inevitably comparing it to other shows at the start. |
Pretty much what I did. You'd have thought I'd have learn't my lesson after nearly missing out on B5 by making that mistake :rolleyes:
willowroolz - October 16, 2004 04:24 PM (GMT)
It's a natural reaction, to compare things in that way, and I do think the writers invited those comparisons during the early stages by telling stories that had been done better elsewhere.
Crichton Kicks - October 16, 2004 07:14 PM (GMT)
I think most shows suffer from that problem Steve, not just Farscape.
willowroolz - October 16, 2004 07:42 PM (GMT)
Persephone - October 16, 2004 09:30 PM (GMT)
It's true, Farscape does borrow from other shows, but they put a unique slant onto an old story, and come up with something that feels totally fresh, or at least that's how I've found it to be.
Phillip, there are some truly dreadful eps in both seasons 1 and 2, but it's worth getting through them, because there are so many excellent eps you'll be rewarded with. It took me 6 or 7 episodes to start liking it, but half way through season 1 I was totally hooked.
Trust me when I say, I don't think I've ever seen a leading television actress as good as Claudia Black, she has on occasion literally moved me to tears, she's that good. Ben Browder too, has been sensational in the latter half of season 1 right up to our current eps in the season 3 rewatch.
(the leather trousers help too, isn't that right Steve :P :lol: :lol: )
willowroolz - October 17, 2004 09:32 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Persephone @ Oct 16 2004, 10:30 PM) |
| (the leather trousers help too, isn't that right Steve :P :lol: :lol: ) |
<_< :lol:
willowroolz - October 18, 2004 11:21 AM (GMT)
I found this when I was looking for PKW related articles. Pretty much sums it up (I've edited spoilers out of it):
| QUOTE |
Why the frenzy over `Farscape'? By Maureen Ryan Tribune staff reporter
What inspires fans' extreme commitment to "Farscape"? After all, even some sci-fi aficionados don't get it.
"Ben Browder and [female lead] Claudia Black are terrific," Stargate SG-1 executive producer Brad Wright said in an e-mail. "The show itself was always a mystery to me. I didn't get it. Maybe I didn't give it enough of a chance because I couldn't get past the muppet."
Actually, there are two puppets on the show -- Rygel, a small, voracious alien who is the deposed "dominar" of an outer-space empire, and Pilot, a multiarmed creature who is biologically connected to Moya.
Who's Moya, you ask? She's the living space ship on which American astronaut John Crichton (Browder) lives -- with a few escaped prisoners he ran into when his ship accidentally got sucked into a wormhole that deposited him in a strange and dicey part of outer space.
For those who got past the puppets -- which was easy to do, given that they were brought to life by the top-notch puppeteers from the Creature Shop founded by Brian Henson's father, Jim Henson -- "Farscape" presented an absorbing, confounding, challengingly complex universe that gleefully defied many of the conventions of televised science fiction.
Epic love story
For one thing, contrary to conventional television wisdom, the two lead characters, Crichton and former soldier Aeryn Sun (Black), began an epic love story early on in the show, and that crazily complicated romance ended up stretching across several seasons.
And pop-culture devotee Crichton wasn't exactly the stereotypically straight-laced, super-competent sci-fi hero. "`E.T.' my ass," a disoriented Crichton says in an early episode. "Spielberg was wrong."
"The charm of `Farscape' is that [Crichton's] not MacGyver," says Black, from the set of an independent film in London. "He can't make a compass out of tape. He's kind of a `Let's make it up as we go' [kind of guy]. He's just trying to save the world so he can be with his girl."
"And we always screw it up, of course," she adds with a throaty laugh.
Black's character, Aeryn Sun, was arresting as well. Before she became part of Moya's crew -- unwillingly at first -- Sun was one of a human-looking race of highly trained soldiers called the Peacekeepers. Not exactly the shy, retiring type, to say the least.
But her slow evolution from no-nonsense butt-kicking military woman to . . . a more compassionate, caring butt-kicking woman was one of "Farscape's" best executed story lines.
"There are very few girls who could kick your [butt] and make you want to kiss them at same time," Browder says of Black's character.
In-depth characters
The show's greatest strength is that whatever crisis Moya and her motley crew confronts, the richly drawn characters always come first. In the mini-series, for example, Sun and Crichton don't let a military assault get in the way of a domestic spat.
"I love that about `Farscape,'" Browder says. "The characters don't go away when things start to blow up."
But if the "Farscape" TV series had one flaw, it was that the stories it told got a trifle complex at times, even for devotees of the show.
Hence the daunting task faced by the writers of the mini-series, David Kemper and show creator Rockne S. O'Bannon, both of whom were executive producers on all four seasons of the show.
"The task at the very beginning was to make it something that `Farscape' virgins shouldn't be afraid of," O'Bannon says.
And the other task, of course, was pleasing all the Scapers who'd campaigned for its comeback.
Satisfying the fans
"We had a healthier budget than we had for the series, and we also just wanted to make it bigger and more special so that we could really satisfy the fans," O'Bannon says. "They had worked so hard for this. To present them with something that was [equivalent to] a C-plus or B-minus episode from the show -- that would have been pretty horrific."
What's next for "Farscape"? Executive producer Brian Henson says he's waiting to see how the mini-series is received, but it sounds like his ideal plan would be to make a "Farscape" feature film, as Joss Whedon is doing with "Serenity," the upcoming big-screen version of the canceled but beloved TV show "Firefly."
"I think what will happen coming out of this is that the strength of the fan base creates a good business for any broadcaster or distributor, because of the amount of push and attention the fans can put into the property," Henson says. |
I think that I've done more than enough plugging for the series, now... but it always sounds better when it comes from someone else :lol:
laughitupfuzzball - November 7, 2004 07:58 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| But if the "Farscape" TV series had one flaw, it was that the stories it told got a trifle complex at times, even for devotees of the show. |
Complex by who's standards? (sorry this is a sore point so I'm going to moan) I don't think its ever been too complex for its fans. Its an odd approach these days to science fiction on television to continually worry about making things accessible to a new audience we are not stupid.
IMO Farscape was successful because of its original stories. Yes I understand the networks want as many viewers as possible but changing the content is not going to help.
To me its more a question of broadening the marketing and advertising of shows like farscape. If the next step was to me a movie then a fabulous trailer goes a long way. (It would stand a much higher chance of getting a larger audience than via television)
I have converted many people into watching sci-fi shows who were totally unaware of their existance. Its a shame that television companies don't put in the same effort. :mad: :mad:
Sorry rant over :D
willowroolz - November 8, 2004 11:04 AM (GMT)
Wow, nice rant, Alex! :lol:
Basically, I think they're looking for excuses for the series' cancellation. The sad fact of the matter is that Sci Fi's viewing figures for the show dropped off dramatically during the third and fourth seasons, which has been attributed to the nature of the ongoing arcs which, they say, prohibits potential viewers from entering the experience. I think that's utter tosh, seeing as I really "discovered" the series early in the third season having given it a miss for quite a while.
I have to say that I never found the stories too complex, but they were complex in a clever and satisfying way. Also, because the story wasn't tied down by militaristic or political trappings there was a lot more freedom and scope for the writers to experiment and just have a lot of fun. Farscape's stories evolved more organically than practically any other series I can think of: they were borne naturally out of character dynamics rather than being enforced by plot structure, which is a problem I've had with other shows. For me it made the series wonderfully unpredictable and freeflowing.
Totally agree on the marketing points. It's ironic, if understandable, that the biggest push the series has received is for The Peacekeeper Wars. Had they put that amount of effort in during the series' run it may have been a different story.
But a counterpoint to that is that Farscape never compromised for anybody: it never altered its values for the sake of viewing figures, and that is something for which I am very grateful. I hate to think what would have happened had that been a concern for the production team. Can you imagine Farscape's answer to Seven of Nine? :x
Unfortunately a lot of people just don't get it. It's their loss.
laughitupfuzzball - November 8, 2004 01:18 PM (GMT)
:D Good point about the militaristic formulae that many American shows seem to adopt. It put me totally off Stargate, Voyager and countless other carbon copies. I am trying to give Stargate Atlantis a try but to me it pales in comparison to Farscape. I think thats why I liked DS9 because Starfleet regulations blah blah blah went out the window :D
It does show how the underlying prevelant politics of a country can affect program making and luckily Farscape bucked the trend.
I know there are a lot of people who will never get Farscape but I honestly believe that it never reached its audience potential. I would never have it altered in any way shape or form like you and just glad we got as many episodes as we did.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
willowroolz - November 8, 2004 01:28 PM (GMT)
Totally agree. I think this has a lot to do with why I find most of the other space shows so tired these days. The military structure seems to be de rigeur.
For me, the only show that may have surpassed Farscape in my affections, or at least equalled it, was Firefly. It worked on a lot of the same principles, particularly with regard to putting the characters first, and - again - there was the total absence of an enforced structure (military or otherwise) that allowed the whole exercise room to breathe.
I'm sure it's not a coincidence that both shows were cancelled before their time. Maybe the target audience requires that "structure" in order to feel like they're on safe ground. It screws the rest of us, though. <_<
laughitupfuzzball - November 8, 2004 01:40 PM (GMT)
:D I did enjoy Firefly but am too annoyed that it got cancelled so early on, just as I was getting into it bam its gone, arrrgghhh. (I felt this way after Farscape was cancelled for quite a long time and couldn't even watch the dvds because it made me so sad).
Its trivial in the order of things but having waited since the original star wars films, 20yrs ago to be finally given a show that not only met but exceeded my expectations only to have it taken away is just so cruel. Do we have to wait another 20yrs I hope not.
Sorry I'm only moaning now because I'm new and have to get these things out. I'll have wonderful things to say about the rewatch:)
:D
Persephone - November 8, 2004 01:50 PM (GMT)
At least we have Serenity to look forward to, as some kind of closure for Firefly anyway :thumbsup:
willowroolz - November 8, 2004 01:51 PM (GMT)
Hey, don't worry, Alex, I'm pretty certain all us 'Scapers feel the same way. I don't think it's any coincidence that I too am a huge Star Wars fan. So what if it's trivial? So what if it's just another tv show? It's escapism of the purest kind and in the world we live in that kind of escapism is a refuge many of us need, be it sci-fi, horror or soap. Actually, those last two kind of go together. :lol:
I sincerely hope that we don't have to wait another 20 years for a show like this to come along. Firefly was the shining beacon of promise, imo. Let's hope that both The Peacekeeper Wars and Serenity are resounding successes all around the world. Maybe then we'll get what we want. :)
willowroolz - November 8, 2004 01:58 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Persephone @ Nov 8 2004, 01:50 PM) |
| At least we have Serenity to look forward to, as some kind of closure for Firefly anyway :thumbsup: |
You beat me to it, Lisa :lol:
Persephone - November 8, 2004 02:01 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (willowroolz @ Nov 8 2004, 01:58 PM) |
| QUOTE (Persephone @ Nov 8 2004, 01:50 PM) | | At least we have Serenity to look forward to, as some kind of closure for Firefly anyway :thumbsup: |
You beat me to it, Lisa :lol:
|
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Great minds and all Steve ;)
willowroolz - November 8, 2004 02:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Persephone @ Nov 8 2004, 02:01 PM) |
| QUOTE (willowroolz @ Nov 8 2004, 01:58 PM) | | QUOTE (Persephone @ Nov 8 2004, 01:50 PM) | | At least we have Serenity to look forward to, as some kind of closure for Firefly anyway :thumbsup: |
You beat me to it, Lisa :lol:
|
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Great minds and all Steve ;)
|
B)
laughitupfuzzball - November 8, 2004 02:18 PM (GMT)
:thumbsup: Yay you have cheered me up, must be the awful weather getting to me. I will look on the bright side and hope that we get more of each, Firefly & Farscape soon!! :clap:
willowroolz - November 8, 2004 02:31 PM (GMT)
My work here is done! :01: B)
Only problem is I feel as depressed as hell about it all now :lol: :lol: :rolleyes:
laughitupfuzzball - November 8, 2004 02:35 PM (GMT)
:lol: :lol: :lol:
This will cheer you up, I watched Eat Me again this morning.
When can we start posting on it? I don't want to spoil for others:)
:thumbsup:
willowroolz - November 8, 2004 02:37 PM (GMT)
Post any time you like. :thumbsup:
I don't think anyone views the threads until they've watched the episode, and if they do they have to expect spoilers anyway. ;)
laughitupfuzzball - November 8, 2004 02:43 PM (GMT)
:thumbsup: Excellent :thumbsup:
Thanks
willowroolz - November 8, 2004 03:48 PM (GMT)
All of this and I didn't even mention some of my favourite dialogue from this ep:
John: You don't want Rygel anyway.
Bekesh: Why don't I?
John: Because... he's not really a king.
Rygel: I'm not?
Bekesh: He's not?
John: He's... an escaped mental patient. Believes he's royalty.
Rygel: You're the mental patient if you expect anybody to believe that-
(Bekesh kicks Rygel)
Bekesh: He's not insane.
Rygel: I could be.
John: No, he's not insane. But he is sick.
(Rygel coughs)
John: He's very sick, very contagious. You ever hear of chicken pox?
Bekesh: He's not sick.
John: Okay, he's not sick. But he is worthless.
:lol:
John: Rygel is an obnoxious gasbag, and who's gonna shell out for that?
Rygel: He's right. I'm unloved, unwanted, unpopular (Kick), unconscious...
:lol: :lol: :lol:
laughitupfuzzball - November 8, 2004 06:37 PM (GMT)
:lol: :lol:
Don't you just love Ryg :D
charlie2times - November 9, 2004 12:00 PM (GMT)
Rygel is my hero, when i grow up i want to be just like him.........................
Mean,selfish,spiteful,childish,greedy,horny,voyeuristic,foul mouthed,greedy,short,fat,legs that don't reach the floor,lazy,idle,
Oh yeah i already am like him.
That's why i like Rygel, 'cause he is (to quote Kirk)
'the most human' character of all of them, including Crichton,
he's the most like us!
willowroolz - November 9, 2004 12:04 PM (GMT)
:lol: :lol:
Great description of him, Jon - spot on. And, to be fair to him, he does actually care and he usually comes good in the end. :thumbsup:
charlie2times - November 9, 2004 12:11 PM (GMT)
And he's ticklish, always a sign of a 'heart of gold' as they say in soapland!
But, as a certain 'big,blue bitch' said, he is also the most wise.
I'm still laughing at his speech to Crichton in 'Crichton Kicks', whic i watched on sunday, and i've seen it 4 times already!
willowroolz - November 9, 2004 12:20 PM (GMT)
Maybe we should have a thread for Favourite Rygel Moment. :unsure:
laughitupfuzzball - November 9, 2004 12:28 PM (GMT)
:thumbsup: I was thinking the same. Can we start one with spoilers as I'm thinking of a particular episode in S3 that not everyone has seen yet:)
:thumbsup:
willowroolz - November 9, 2004 12:39 PM (GMT)