Title: Troll Baiting On The Beeb!!!
jamiearmour - February 3, 2005 01:41 PM (GMT)
I've launched the first attack on your fiend and mine on the beeb trek boards. It should get a reaction, is anyone else going to join me in pasting the little creep to the wall and then cementing over him? :lmao: :whistling:
Persephone - February 3, 2005 01:43 PM (GMT)
yay troll bashing :group:
Crichton Kicks - February 3, 2005 05:56 PM (GMT)
I'm sure I'll have something to add in a little while :thumbsup:
jamiearmour - February 3, 2005 06:50 PM (GMT)
Hmmmm, he's not taking the bait.
Then again, he can only post after his doctor has given him permission to use the wards PC.
It's only a matter of patience :D
Steve - February 3, 2005 08:10 PM (GMT)
He cant respond yet because school finished at 3.30pm and his ZX81 at home isnt connected to the net!
Crichton Kicks - February 3, 2005 08:34 PM (GMT)
There's no phone line in the basement :thumbsup:
jamiearmour - February 3, 2005 10:49 PM (GMT)
It's his "mothers" turn online tonight. She's researching where she went wrong :lmao:
Crichton Kicks - February 3, 2005 11:15 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Feb 3 2005, 10:49 PM) |
| She's researching where she went wrong :lmao: |
Fairly obvious, surely :lol:
Crichton Kicks - February 8, 2005 08:10 PM (GMT)
Jamie, Bester's just launched a particularly scathing attack on the thick one using your recently-found material :thumbsup:
Steve - February 8, 2005 08:40 PM (GMT)
But will Mr Rylander actually have the balls to reply or will he drift off back to 'The Carl Zone'??? :wox:
I wouldnt hold your breath because he hasnt replied to anyones comments about the Bush administration thing he posted.
Phillip Culley - February 8, 2005 10:20 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Steve @ Feb 8 2005, 08:40 PM) |
But will Mr Rylander actually have the balls to reply or will he drift off back to 'The Carl Zone'??? :wox:
I wouldnt hold your breath because he hasnt replied to anyones comments about the Bush administration thing he posted. |
Surely this is typical of Carl though - he posts one of his many inane threads, and then doesn't answer unless he's realy provoked :)
Crichton Kicks - February 8, 2005 10:40 PM (GMT)
I can't see him letting Bester's post pass without comment :lol:
jamiearmour - February 8, 2005 10:47 PM (GMT)
I wish I'd spotted that before SG1 started. it's too late to post on the beeb now :tear:
Maybe I'll wait to see if he actually replies :ph43r: :lmao:
Crichton Kicks - February 8, 2005 10:59 PM (GMT)
Never fear Jamie, there's always tomorrow :lol:
jamiearmour - February 8, 2005 11:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Angel @ Feb 9 2005, 12:59 AM) |
| Never fear Jamie, there's always tomorrow :lol: |
True, and SG1 was too good to miss tonight :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
jamiearmour - February 10, 2005 09:55 PM (GMT)
OMG, it actually replied to Bester's post :o :o :o
Sorry James that my info was not exact about the ratings of each show as he pointed out :blush: I have apologised for my error and challenged him to apologise for his similar "errors" in the "quoting" of the "Holy book". I wonder if he'll have the courage of his convictions?
Of course I say convictions when I know he got away with everything by pleading insanity :lmao:
laughitupfuzzball - February 10, 2005 10:06 PM (GMT)
:lol: I bet you enjoyed that post more than any of his others :lol:
with a cherry on top :lol:
jamiearmour - February 10, 2005 10:14 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (laughitupfuzzball @ Feb 11 2005, 12:06 AM) |
:lol: I bet you enjoyed that post more than any of his others :lol:
with a cherry on top :lol: |
I can't honestly say I've enjoyed ANY of Carls posts to date, but I did find the back pedalling in this post smirk worthy :) :rolleyes:
Crichton Kicks - February 10, 2005 11:54 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Feb 10 2005, 09:55 PM) |
OMG, it actually replied to Bester's post :o :o :o
Sorry James that my info was not exact about the ratings of each show as he pointed out :blush: I have apologised for my error and challenged him to apologise for his similar "errors" in the "quoting" of the "Holy book". I wonder if he'll have the courage of his convictions?
Of course I say convictions when I know he got away with everything by pleading insanity :lmao: |
Fear not Jamie, there was still plenty of ammunition there to hit back with :lol:
Phillip Culley - February 11, 2005 12:01 AM (GMT)
I might ask him where's he's planning to go once the BBC boards close :)
Crichton Kicks - February 11, 2005 12:19 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Feb 11 2005, 12:01 AM) |
| I might ask him where's he's planning to go once the BBC boards close :) |
I dares ya :lol:
jamiearmour - February 11, 2005 12:50 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Feb 11 2005, 02:01 AM) |
| I might ask him where's he's planning to go once the BBC boards close :) |
Straight to hell? :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :ph43r:
Steve - February 11, 2005 06:29 PM (GMT)
Made me chuckle when he said Bester was trolling!
Pot-kettle-black springs to mind... :drool:
Crichton Kicks - February 11, 2005 06:53 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Steve @ Feb 11 2005, 06:29 PM) |
| Pot-kettle-black springs to mind... :drool: |
Not to mention tw*t :lol:
prophecy girl - February 12, 2005 04:45 PM (GMT)
knowing that tony was coming once every month (or two months ... kinda irregular troll phase), i think it's gonna be hard to keep an eye on every newby passing by. i can't believe he wasted his time to create a new mail address just to pass the mods .... nothing ever stopped him :( ... but maybe with the last experience (as in being banned in less than one hour), he might understand that he can't have as fun as before. we can hope
jamiearmour - February 12, 2005 04:55 PM (GMT)
Hey PG :D
We're currently bashing a troll on the beeb star trek board. You wanna start a campaign to wipe that little toad off the buffy boards before they close?
I'm having great fun. :lol:
prophecy girl - February 12, 2005 05:04 PM (GMT)
not being a trekky (sp?), i am going to let you have fun and just read :)
Persephone - February 12, 2005 08:39 PM (GMT)
Well, you boys have certainly been busy today ;) :lol: :lol: :lol:
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 08:59 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Persephone @ Feb 12 2005, 08:39 PM) |
| Well, you boys have certainly been busy today ;) :lol: :lol: :lol: |
Well the clock's ticking, we need to have as much fun with the little tw*t as possible before we lose the chance :lol:
Nice to see your return as well John ;)
jamiearmour - February 12, 2005 09:28 PM (GMT)
I've actally been a little evil tonight (spurred on by Miran honest :innocent: ) and tracked him down on trekweb. His last post there was in 2003 when he complained about story arcs and how they close out new writers, like he wishes to be :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Oh dear, that boy will be the death of me, I haven't laughed that hard in ages.
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 09:30 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Feb 12 2005, 09:28 PM) |
I've actally been a little evil tonight (spurred on by Miran honest :innocent: ) and tracked him down on trekweb. His last post there was in 2003 when he complained about story arcs and how they close out new writers, like he wishes to be :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Oh dear, that boy will be the death of me, I haven't laughed that hard in ages. |
I've registered on Trekweb as well ;)
What's his name on there Jamie ??
I'd imagine he's probably changed his account name since then.
jamiearmour - February 12, 2005 09:39 PM (GMT)
It was simply carluk. I'm uss_defiant on there now btw. (The one from the Tholian Web not the toilet seat LOL)
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 09:41 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Feb 12 2005, 09:39 PM) |
| It was simply carluk. I'm uss_defiant on there now btw. (The one from the Tholian Web not the toilet seat LOL) |
Ah, yes, you've replied to one of the threads I've replied to :lol:
Crichton Kicks :thumbsup:
jamiearmour - February 12, 2005 09:47 PM (GMT)
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 09:48 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| Why not just give the show a chance and then make up your mind whether you like it or not. There was a time when there was no Star Trek on the box at all, now you have it you don't stop moaning about it. At least you will get to see Enterprise in the fall, we here in England will have to wait till the new year and then only if we subscribe to satellite tv. If we wait for the video's then it will be way into next year, they've only just started releasing season 7 of Voyager. As for Endgame we've still got to wait a couple of months yet to see that on tv and of cousre its not going to be a suprise to us! Just be gratefull of what you have, we don't make anything like Trek over here. As a not very big fan of TOS I think the three recent Series have all been consistantly hight class and entertaining, far suppior to any other tv sci-fi, so stop whinging and give the new show a chance! |
Oh dear. Does anyone want to take the highlighted points up with him ?? :lol:
Carl never gives anything else a chance, why should they ?? And he's not a TOS fan ?? :lol: Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear......
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 09:50 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Feb 12 2005, 09:47 PM) |
| copy cat Hmmph. ;) |
I believe I replied first :p
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 09:54 PM (GMT)
Here's one from his Aikido group;
| QUOTE |
Re: Locking/pinning as pain submission...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think some people are getting a little too soft. Obviously, you can't infilct pain when training, but in a real fight situation,(which is what Aikido is supposed to be preparing you for), it would be essential.
I haven't started training yet. |
And the only response;
| QUOTE |
Re: Locking/pinning as pain submission...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Rylander wrote: I think some people are getting a little too soft. Obviously, you can't infilct pain when training
Yes you can, and I'd argue you should.
Carl Rylander wrote: but in a real fight situation,(which is what Aikido is supposed to be preparing you for)
A lot of people would disagree.
Carl Rylander wrote: it would be essential.
No it would not.
So it seems we disagree, Carl |
:lol: He has the same effect everywhere.
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 10:01 PM (GMT)
Here's another one;
| QUOTE |
Re: Aikido main defense in murder trial
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't he have knocked the attacker out or something? I've heard that there's moves in Aikido which paralyse people: A neck pinch or something. I think you're only justified in killing somone if there's more than one opponent. If it was me being attacked, if he still continued after the first redirection, I'd break his arm or paralyse him That would lessen the chances of his reattacking considerably.
I haven't taken up Aikido yet. |
A neck pinch ?? I told you he couldn't tell where Trek ended and reality begins :lol:
As for the rest of it, :lmao: Carl would DESTROY them !!!! :lol:
And he hasn't taken it up yet. Just like he's still thinking of doing a degree :rolleyes:
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 10:09 PM (GMT)
I've found the one in question;
| QUOTE |
RE: After all these years... | Report this post to moderator By: carl (Odo's file, contact, block) @ 09:00:45 on Dec 17, 2003 I don't agree with story arcs at all. It makes ST more of a cliquey, nerdy, thing and also makes it more difficlut for independent writers to submit stories, which I'm hoping to do. |
Guess you'll be submitting those stories to another series now then :lol:
Crichton Kicks - February 12, 2005 10:13 PM (GMT)
And another one;
| QUOTE |
RE: A reply for Braga | Report this post to moderator By: carl (Odo's file, contact, block) @ 04:37:47 on Aug 22, 2003 Hey, give the guy a break! SOME Star Trek is better than no Star Trek at all!!!
|
Obviously not :lol:
Ooh, and the response;
| QUOTE |
RE: A reply for Braga | Report this post to moderator By: Manicmarv (Odo's file, contact, block) @ 06:44:05 on Aug 22, 2003 | (1) So a poorly written, predictably-plotted Star Trek is better than no Star Trek at all?
You don't get it, do you? By continuing to watch you only help support a badly done show that doesn't deserve it. And that support is seen by execs at Paramount as positive not negatively hopeful. If everyone who was critical of the show did that because it's 'Star Trek' would it get better or continue plod along in mediocrity?
It's the same thing as the 'needing 3 seasons crap'. It's just an excuse. I don't care about the alleged continuity problems, just give people good, engrossing stories and interesting, consistant characters and no-one will care about continuity. Get the characters and scripts right you can even get away with predictable stories.
So if you want more of the same in the show, then keep watching it! |
Well said Sir :thumbsup: