View Full Version: Enterprise Season 4 Ratings

Cult Tv Boards > Star Trek > Enterprise Season 4 Ratings

Pages: [1] 2


Title: Enterprise Season 4 Ratings


Crichton Kicks - October 9, 2004 05:29 PM (GMT)
Quote taken from Trektoday;

QUOTE
Enterprise's viewership levels dropped for the fourth year in a row yesterday, as viewers turned out to be more compelled by the American presidential debate than by "Storm Front, Part One's" Alien Nazis.

According to fast national ratings provided by Zap2It, Star Trek: Enterprise received a 2.0 rating with a 4 share, meaning that 2% of American households with televisions were tuned in to the show, as well as 4% of those actually watching TV at 8:00pm. The final ratings as well as the actual number of viewers for Enterprise will be available sometime next week, but historically, the fast national ratings are a good indication of these numbers. When these numbers become available, there is a possibility that "Storm Front, Part One" will beat "Damage's" unfortunate record of least-watched Star Trek episode ever.

These ratings represent a drop of around 20% from last year's season average. The third season season finale, "Zero Hour," received a 2.5/4 fast national and a 2.7/4 final rating, while last year's season premiere scored a 2.6 final rating. Percentage-wise, the drop from last year is comparable to that between the second and the third seasons, but not as large as that between the first and the second seasons.

In the 8pm timeslot, Star Trek: Enterprise still managed to tie for fourth place with FOX's The Complex: Malibu. The most-watched show of the hour was CBS's Joan of Arcadia, followed closely by NBC's Dateline and ABC's sitcom block. Last was the WB, which aired a combination of What I Like About You and Grounded For Life. Enterprise also was the most-watched UPN show of the night, as an America's Next Top Model ended up in last place in its timeslot with a 1.8 rating.

Enterprise wasn't helped by the debate between President Bush and Senator Kerry, which in many markets aired directly opposite Enterprise. All four major networks as well as many cable channels aired the debate, with most attracting more viewers than they usually would for their normal programming. Enterprise also suffered from being pre-empted in several major markets, where local UPN affiliates decided to show coverage related to the presidential debate.



Not the best of starts, but I'll be more interested to see what the numbers are like next week. Similar numbers would pretty much make cancellation a formality :(

Phillip Culley - October 9, 2004 05:43 PM (GMT)
The phrase 'That's it - we're boned' does indeed come to mind!

Fingers crossed we get to see the complete season broadcast and they don't pull it halfway through...

Crichton Kicks - October 9, 2004 05:47 PM (GMT)
If the numbers hold steady at 2.0 or less, it won't make mid season. Can't remember what Jake 2.0's numbers were last season but I doubt they were much worse than that. Not looking good. Just have to hope most people last night were tuned in to Bush hoping he'd make a tw*t of himself again :rolleyes:

ken1701e - October 9, 2004 08:20 PM (GMT)
The americains wouldnt know a good thing if it shit on their heads!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Phillip Culley - October 9, 2004 09:10 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ken1701e @ Oct 9 2004, 09:20 PM)
The americains wouldnt know a good thing if it shit on their heads!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

But Ken, surely these are the same Americans who invented Trek in the first place :)

After all, it's not as if Enterprise has made much of an impact over here outside of genre fans :)

Crichton Kicks - October 10, 2004 12:20 AM (GMT)
Not sure we can argue from that viewpoint Ken, we pretty much gave the world Reality TV :rolleyes:

ken1701e - October 10, 2004 07:44 AM (GMT)
I know guys, sorry, I was just angry yesterday and I get very defensive where TREK is concerned.

Reality Tv - I cannot stand any of it. Sometimes I think if you could have a tv without a licence if you didnt watch terrestrial tv I would do it.

Crichton Kicks - October 10, 2004 08:57 AM (GMT)
No need to apologise Ken :)

If it had been a few years ago I'd have been more defensive myself. Star Trek's what got me into cult television. Nowadays though there are just so many shows I watch and like that whilst I'd be disappointed to have no Trek, it wouldn't shatter my world anymore.

And let's face it, a break is in the franchise's best interests right now. We've been saturated with Trek over the past decade.

Number Six - October 11, 2004 11:56 AM (GMT)
I suppose we should be grateful that the Americans show an interest in politics : ;)

If Howard and Princess Tony debated over here it would probably get less viewers than the weather forecast :(

Crichton Kicks - October 11, 2004 11:59 AM (GMT)
I think it's artificial. People only tuned into the debate to see Bush get made a monkey of again ;) Any other time they probably couldn't care less either.

Crichton Kicks - October 11, 2004 08:57 PM (GMT)
Sounds like someone's cage has been well and truly rattled;

QUOTE
Contrary to most media reports, which in last week's season premiere reviews had dire things to say about the future of Star Trek, Enterprise is alive and well, according to a Chicago Tribune writer.

Maureen Ryan, one of few professional critics to praise "Storm Front, Part One" (story), wrote in the Tribune that Enterprise is "still alive and kicking", noting that while many prominent newspapers were writing about the show's likely cancellation, "'Enterprise' got good last season. Really good."

New executive producer Manny Coto told Ryan that he was tired of seeing articles reciting the same information about the potential fate of Star Trek, though he said he understood fan resistance to prequels as he felt some of the same resistance to the new Star Wars films after loving the original trilogy. On the other hand, Brannon Braga said that while he concedes the validity of some complaints about the execution, the concept of a prequel was and remains sound.

"We could have put [the series] further in the future...but then, what, are the spandex uniforms tighter?" asked Braga, who admitted that there does seem to be an impression that Star Trek has worn out its welcome. "We have a hard-core group of fans," he stated. "The question is, is that enough to keep a show on the air financially?"

Meanwhile, star Scott Bakula (Archer) protested that he believes the third season of Enterprise to be as good as any other Trek series or other shows on television. Bakula complained about the fans as well as the professional critics, saying he was particularly disgusted by the bashing of Braga and Rick Berman that he has seen on Star Trek online sites. ""Why are you spending energy and time on 'Enterprise'? Move on to other shows," the actor recommended to unhappy fans.



I particularly like Scott Bakula's comments. I think you'll find Scott, that too many people have gone on to find other shows. That's what's gotten you into this mess in the first place. Which brings us back to your gripe about bashing Berman/Braga. :rolleyes:

ken1701e - October 13, 2004 06:49 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
Star Trek: Enterprise was dealt a blow yesterday when nearly 26% of last season's viewers didn't return for the premiere- despite making a big improvement in the timeslot for UPN.

According to Mediaweek's Programming Inside Marc Berman, final ratings saw the show take 2.9 million viewers, and a rating of 1.3/4 in the adults 18-49 demographic. This means that 1.3% of this audience watched the show, rising to 4% when factoring only in households watching TV at the time of airing.

The previous season's finale, "Zero Hour", took home 3.91 million viewers and a 1.7/5 rating in the adults 18-49 demographic. This represents a significant loss of audience for the show. Whilst the number of viewers dropped significantly, the adults 18-49 category result for "Storm Front, Part I" (1.34) is comparable to results for some of the episodes in the latter half of the previous season- identical to results for "The Forgotten" and "E2". Only "Damage" scored lower at 1.2/4.

That said, Enterprise made significant improvement on the 8:00pm timeslot, formerly used by the Friday night movie. This, combined with the extensive presidential debate coverage, pockets of pre-emption and coverage in only 81% of the country, may explain why Marc Berman chose not consign it to Friday's "Losers Column". Total viewers were 10% over the previous week's movie, with an 40% rise in adults 25-54 and third place in the hour for men aged 18-49.


From TREK TODAY

ken1701e - October 13, 2004 06:51 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Angel @ Oct 10 2004, 10:57 AM)
it wouldn't shatter my world anymore.


It would mine.

Phillip Culley - October 13, 2004 08:26 AM (GMT)
So, the question is what scared off about a million people? I can only think of 2 reasons (avoiding the obvious lack of interest, and I don't factor in the Presidential debate - the likes of Joan of Arcadia managed to get over twice as many viewers at the same time; why can't Enterprise?):

a ) the delayed premiere dwarfed it when it was premiered

b ) the Alien Nazi at the end destroying peoples hopes after the rollercoaster at the end of S3.

What doesn't help matters, of course, is that if there were people who missed it accidentally then coming halfway through a 2-part story would well put them off...

Crichton Kicks - October 13, 2004 07:22 PM (GMT)
Making matters worse still is that they've let three decent writers go. David Goodman and Phyllis Strong were ok, but Chris Black wrote Carbon Creek and First Flight, both of which I enjoyed.

ken1701e - October 13, 2004 07:25 PM (GMT)
If Eastenders were made in America would they have cancelled it by now?

I think that they want to keep ENTERPRISE going, you can hear it in the excuses like it did well for that slot on a friday.

I hope they do keep it going. I would be devestated if they cancelled it. I love the series and I want it to continue beyond season 4 maybe even to series 7 (but I doubt it will happen)

Crichton Kicks - October 13, 2004 07:30 PM (GMT)
It was granted a fourth season on the proviso that they greatly reduce the budget and the number of episodes. The numbers are still in freefall. A fifth season is a near impossibility at this point. A miracle of biblical proportions is needed now Ken.

Paramount won't be that bothered, they'll have enough episodes in the can by the end of the year to sell the show into syndication.

Phillip Culley - October 13, 2004 09:37 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ken1701e @ Oct 13 2004, 08:25 PM)
If Eastenders were made in America would they have cancelled it by now?

It depends - EastEnders' average viewing figures are (disregarding thisrecent lull) usually around 10 million overall, which equatesto a 6th of the entire UK population.

In comparison, the population of the USA is about 300 million, and a 6th of that would be about 50 million.

Now of course, this isn;t really a valid comparison, but it gives the impression that if EastEnders gets the same kind of success it gets here, it would be very successful in the US :) (compare to CSI, a huge hit, which is getting viewing figures of about 15 million)

Crichton Kicks - October 13, 2004 10:41 PM (GMT)
Soaps are usually onto a winner if for no other reason than that they pamper to the braindead masses.

Popularity is rarely a sign of quality, just look at the top rated TV show of all time. Baywatch :rolleyes: Says it all really ;)

I'm surprised B/B haven't hit upon the winning idea of T'Pol changing her uniform again, a swimsuit perhaps ?? :lol:

Crichton Kicks - October 16, 2004 07:42 PM (GMT)
Updated numbers for Part 2;

QUOTE
Star Trek: Enterprise had another dismal ratings night, though part two of the season premiere narrowly beat What I Like About You and Grounded For Life on the WB.

The fast national ratings at Zap2It indicate that Enterprise brought in a 1.7 rating/3 share for UPN. This means that 1.7% of American households with televisions were tuned in to "Storm Front, Part Two", representing 4% of homes with televisions turned on during the 8 p.m. hour.

Last week the show received a 2.0 rating/4 share in the fast national ratings despite pre-emptions in several areas for major league baseball coverage. Last night's Yankees-Red Sox playoff game was rained out. NBC's Dateline won Enterprise's time slot with a 6.4/12.

These ratings suggest that Enterprise has lost nearly a third of its viewers since the third season finale, "Zero Hour", which earned a 2.5/4 fast national rating. It also represents nearly a fifteen percent drop from last week's season premiere, "Storm Front, Part One."

Although UPN finished ahead of the WB for the 8 p.m. hour, it finished last for the night with a 1.5 overall fast national rating. The WB brought in a 2.1. Final ratings will be available sometime next week.


This really isn't looking good. There was no Presidential debate last night, and the baseball was rained out, and it still loses a further 15% from the previous week ?? :(

ken1701e - October 16, 2004 07:52 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Angel @ Oct 16 2004, 09:42 PM)
Updated numbers for Part 2;

QUOTE
Star Trek: Enterprise had another dismal ratings night, though part two of the season premiere narrowly beat What I Like About You and Grounded For Life on the WB.

The fast national ratings at Zap2It indicate that Enterprise brought in a 1.7 rating/3 share for UPN. This means that 1.7% of American households with televisions were tuned in to "Storm Front, Part Two", representing 4% of homes with televisions turned on during the 8 p.m. hour.

Last week the show received a 2.0 rating/4 share in the fast national ratings despite pre-emptions in several areas for major league baseball coverage. Last night's Yankees-Red Sox playoff game was rained out. NBC's Dateline won Enterprise's time slot with a 6.4/12.

These ratings suggest that Enterprise has lost nearly a third of its viewers since the third season finale, "Zero Hour", which earned a 2.5/4 fast national rating. It also represents nearly a fifteen percent drop from last week's season premiere, "Storm Front, Part One."

Although UPN finished ahead of the WB for the 8 p.m. hour, it finished last for the night with a 1.5 overall fast national rating. The WB brought in a 2.1. Final ratings will be available sometime next week.


This really isn't looking good. There was no Presidential debate last night, and the baseball was rained out, and it still loses a further 15% from the previous week ?? :(

as i said before they wouldnt know a good thing if it crapped in their hat.

I loved part 2 and I hope that the series continues as it is now because at the moment this is the best start to a STAR TREK series in years.

Lets see what happens in the coming weeks.

Crichton Kicks - October 16, 2004 08:03 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ken1701e @ Oct 16 2004, 08:52 PM)
Lets see what happens in the coming weeks.

If the numbers keep dropping, cancellation :(

ken1701e - October 16, 2004 08:04 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Angel @ Oct 16 2004, 10:03 PM)
QUOTE (ken1701e @ Oct 16 2004, 08:52 PM)
Lets see what happens in the coming weeks.

If the numbers keep dropping, cancellation :(

If it happens, it happens, but lets go out on a high.

There is a part of me that wishes someone would kill B&B for what they have done to my beloved Trek and I feel incredibly sorry for ENTERPRISE. It has turned into a wonderful series but unfortunately thanks to that anal pair and also in part thanks to Voyager it has never really stood a chance.

Well I love it I dont care what those B*****d americains think

<apologies to any americains who post here>

Crichton Kicks - October 16, 2004 08:33 PM (GMT)
Ken, I've gotta ask, but who are these Americains of whom you speak ?? :lol:

Phillip Culley - October 16, 2004 09:37 PM (GMT)
Well, it's pretty safe I can tell Krystal to plan to move here around June time, as after this season of Enterprise finishes there won't be any more for her to tape :)

Crichton Kicks - October 17, 2004 11:04 AM (GMT)
It's looking increasingly unlikely at this point isn't it ??

If the numbers continue dropping in the current trend, it's going to be pretty lucky to last until mid season.

ken1701e - October 17, 2004 11:13 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Angel @ Oct 16 2004, 10:33 PM)
Ken, I've gotta ask, but who are these Americains of whom you speak ?? :lol:

which? The ones I dont care about what they think or the fact that I apologised incase any post here.

Crichton Kicks - October 17, 2004 11:18 AM (GMT)
Presumably this would be the Americans then ??

Americains just had me thinking of them as McCain's oven chips every time you mentioned them :lol:

ken1701e - October 17, 2004 11:50 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Angel @ Oct 17 2004, 01:18 PM)
Presumably this would be the Americans then ??

Americains just had me thinking of them as McCain's oven chips every time you mentioned them :lol:

ok, very funny so I spelt it wrong - look I said I had an English degree I never said I could spell :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Crichton Kicks - October 17, 2004 12:37 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ken1701e @ Oct 17 2004, 12:50 PM)
QUOTE (Angel @ Oct 17 2004, 01:18 PM)
Presumably this would be the Americans then ??

Americains just had me thinking of them as McCain's oven chips every time you mentioned them  :lol:

ok, very funny so I spelt it wrong - look I said I had an English degree I never said I could spell :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Crichton Kicks - October 20, 2004 08:08 PM (GMT)
A bit better news for the ratings woes of late;

QUOTE
LARGEST GAINS FOR RETURNING SERIES IN NEW TIME SLOTS VS. ITS CURRENT TIME SLOT AVERAGE FROM THE PREVIOUS SEASON

+55.44% - Reba (The WB, vs. Grounded for Life)
+25.00% - Star Trek: Enterprise (UPN, vs. UPN's Night at the Movies)
+9.80% - Third Watch (NBC, vs. Boomtown/Law & Order: SVU)


Only problem being, it's cheaper to buy movie rights than it is to produce a show like Enterprise.

Crichton Kicks - October 24, 2004 01:18 PM (GMT)
Good news for 4x03, the fast national rating was up .2;

QUOTE
There was good news for Star Trek: Enterprise in the fast national ratings this week, as the series rose .2, nearly back to the numbers for its season premiere.

Zap2It reports that Enterprise brought in a 1.9 rating/4 share for UPN. This means that 1.9% of American households with televisions were tuned in to "Home", representing 4% of homes with televisions turned on during the 8 p.m. hour. The show beat the WB's What I Like About You and Grounded for Life for the 8 p.m. hour.

Last week the show earned only a 1.7/3, yet total audience numbers grew from the week previously, so the total ratings for "Home" might be higher still. Competition from major league baseball broadcast has significantly affected regular television series ratings, but last night there was no game on Fox.

NBC swept the night with fast national ratings averaging a 6.2/11, beating second-place CBS in all three hours. Overall UPN managed a 1.6/3 for the night, putting it behind the WB's 2.3/4. Final audience numbers will be available sometime next week.


Phillip Culley - October 24, 2004 09:18 PM (GMT)
While it looks optimistic, I don't think it's the saving grace people were expecting (I know several Enterprise fans on the TrekBBS were convinced ratings were low cause of the silly Nazi ending and the subsequent 2-part 'let's sort this out', and come 'Home', more people would watch it since it would be proper Enterprise (of course, I doubt any casual viewers would know that the magical third episode was when the Storm Front story finished, but there you go :))

I think we'll know for sure how Enterprise's future stands over the next few weeks, when they bring out the Spiner arc for sweeps...

Crichton Kicks - October 24, 2004 09:28 PM (GMT)
You're right Phillip. They'll need to recapture the numbers from Season 3 to have any chance at all. This week's improvement is a stopping of the rot, but they now need to go back up yet further. As I mentioned earlier, Enterprise's numbers are an improvement on the timeslot from last season, but it's a hell of a lot cheaper for UPN to buy movie rights than produce a full season of episodic television.

Crichton Kicks - October 30, 2004 07:10 PM (GMT)
Good news. Nothing spectacular, but holding steady;

QUOTE
Star Trek: Enterprise tied its season premiere numbers in the fast national ratings last night with Brent Spiner and "Borderland", rising .1 from the week before.

Zap2It reports that Enterprise brought in a 2.0 rating/4 share for UPN. This means that 2% of American households with televisions were tuned in to "Borderland", representing 4% of homes with televisions turned on during the 8 p.m. hour. The show tied with the WB's What I Like About You and A Scooby-Doo Halloween for the 8 p.m. hour.

Last week the show earned a 1.9/4, up from the 1.7/3 brought in the week before that. Total audience numbers have reflected higher viewership than the ratings predicted earlier in the season. Last night NBC's Dateline won the eight o'clock hour with a 6.2/12, a slightly higher share than last week.

Unfortunately UPN averaged only a 1.6/3 for the night, behind Fox's 2.1/4 and the WB's 2.3/4. However, Enterprise receives the credit for much of that rating as the rerun of America's Next Top Model at 9 brought in only a 1.3/2.


Crichton Kicks - November 8, 2004 06:58 PM (GMT)
Updated numbers for 4x05;

QUOTE
Star Trek: Enterprise reached its highest fast national ratings of the season last night, rising .1 for the second week in a row to numbers higher than those for the season premiere.

Zap2It reports that Enterprise brought in a 2.1 rating/4 share for UPN. This means that 2.1% of American households with televisions were tuned in to "Cold Station 12", which represents 4% of homes with televisions turned on during the 8 p.m. hour. In that time slot, Enterprise finished ahead of the WB's recently cancelled but not yet off-the-air What I Like About You as well as Grounded For Life.

"Borderland", the first episode in the arc with Brent Spiner, had earned a 2.0/4 last week, so the elevated numbers at the start of sweeps month are encouraging. "Home" brought in only a 1.9/4 in the fast national ratings though its total viewership reflected a greater audience overall.

Though NBC's Dateline continued to dominate the hour with a 6.9/12 rating, UPN has consistently beaten the WB at 8 p.m., despite a lower average for Friday nights overall because reruns of America's Next Top Model have failed to compete in the 9 p.m. hour.


Crichton Kicks - November 15, 2004 07:45 PM (GMT)
An update for The Augments;

QUOTE
Star Trek: Enterprise tied its rating for "Cold Station 12" with "The Augments", the final installment in the Brent Spiner arc, coming in fourth place in the 8 p.m. hour ahead of shows on Fox and the WB.

Zap2It reports that Enterprise brought in a 2.1 rating/4 share for UPN. The numbers indicate that 2.1% of American households with televisions were tuned in to "The Augments", representing 4% of homes with televisions on during the 8 p.m. hour. Enterprise beat both Fox's World's Craziest Videos and the WB's What I Like About You and Grounded For Life.

"Borderland", the first episode in the Augments arc, had brought in a 2.0/4 rating two weeks ago, meaning that Enterprise's fast national ratings are not only up but holding steady during this sweeps month thus far.

A Friday night repeat of CSI: NY - scheduled after the original broadcast two days earlier was abbreviated in many markets when the news cut in - enabled CBS to win the night, though NBC's Dateline won the 8 p.m. hour with a 7.3/3 rating. UPN finished last for the night with only a 1.7/3 overall average due to weak ratings on the part of an encore America's Next Top Model broadcast.


On the positive side, the numbers looked to have bottomed out. On the other hand, I'm sure they'd have been expecting more from the Spiner Sweeps episodes.

Crichton Kicks - November 21, 2004 10:04 PM (GMT)
Numbers for The Forge;

QUOTE
The Forge" brought Star Trek: Enterprise back to Vulcan, yet its ratings were only lukewarm last night.

Zap2It reports that Star Trek: Enterprise brought in a 1.9 rating/3 share for UPN. These numbers mean that 1.9% of American households with televisions were estimated to have tuned in to "The Forge", representing 3% of homes with televisions on during the 8 p.m. hour.

The show finished in last place for the hour behind the WB's What I Like About You and Grounded For Life, which earned a combined 2.0/3 rating. UPN had only a 1.6/3 total rating for the night and a 1.0. among adults 18-49 year olds, brought down by low ratings for the encore of America's Next Top Model.

Last week, "The Augments" earned a 2.1/4 in the fast national ratings, as did "Cold Station 12" the week before. As usual, NBC won the 8 p.m. hour with Dateline, closely followed by CBS' Joan of Arcadia. FOX got a boost from a repeat of the premiere of its new show House.

Crichton Kicks - November 27, 2004 11:12 PM (GMT)
Updated for 4x08 Awakening;

QUOTE
The post-Thanksgiving night's episode of Star Trek: Enterprise, "Awakening", brought in fast national ratings that were slightly lower than the week before.

Zap2It reports that Enterprise brought in a 1.8 rating/3 share for UPN, putting the show in fifth place out of six in the time slot. These numbers mean that 1.8% of American households with televisions were estimated to have tuned in to "Awakening", representing 3% of homes with televisions on during the 8 p.m. hour.

Though Thanksgiving weekend has historically brought in lower ratings as audiences turn off the television to spend time traveling and with family, overall viewership was not particularly low on Friday night. CBS had the highest rating of the night for a CSI: Crime Scene Investigation rerun at 10. NBC won the 8 o'clock time slot with Dateline, which brought in a slightly-lower-than-average but still competitive 5.9/11, while CBS' Joan of Arcadia in second place earned a 5.5/10.

Enterprise did beat the WB's What I Like About You and Grounded For Life. But last week The Forge earned a slightly higher rating, a 1.9/3, while "The Augments" brought in a 2.1/4 the week before that. A UPN WWE special failed to raise the ratings at 9, putting the network in last place for the night.


Crichton Kicks - December 5, 2004 01:50 PM (GMT)
Updated for 4x09 Kir'Shara;

QUOTE
Though the middle installment of the Vulcan arc brought in low numbers on the night after Thanksgiving, "Kir'Shara" raised Star Trek: Enterprise's ratings to the level it achieved several weeks earlier.

Zap2It reports that Enterprise brought in a 2.1 rating/4 share for UPN. These numbers mean that 2.1% of American households with televisions were estimated to have tuned in to "Kir'Shara", representing 4% of homes watching television during the 8 p.m. hour.

Though UPN continued to trail the other five networks for the night as a rerun of America's Next Top Model failed to hold he audience, Enterprise again beat the WB's What I Like About You and Grounded For Life in an hour dominated by NBC's Dateline and CBS's seasonal broadcast of Frosty the Snowman and its sequel.

Last week "Awakening" earned only a 1.8 rating/3 share in the fast national ratings, which predict total ratings. Two weeks earlier, "The Augments" brought in a 2.1/4.






Hosted for free by InvisionFree