Title: Stargate On Sky One...
Phillip Culley - August 17, 2004 03:11 PM (GMT)
Will begin with SG-1 on the 5th of October, and then Atlantis on the 12th of October.
Presumably this means we'll get both parts of SG-1's 'New Order' on the 5th, both parts of Atlantis's 'Rising' on the 12th, and then an episode of each series from the 19th onwards.
willowroolz - August 17, 2004 03:18 PM (GMT)
Great! Thanks for the info, Phillip. :)
Now I just have to figure out how I'm going to watch another 5 seasons before then! :o :lol:
Phillip Culley - August 17, 2004 03:33 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| Now I just have to figure out how I'm going to watch another 5 seasons before then! |
Very, very quickly :)
willowroolz - August 17, 2004 03:36 PM (GMT)
:lol: :lol:
And I thought I was doing well having watched two seasons already... :toomuchtv:
Crichton Kicks - August 17, 2004 04:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Aug 17 2004, 04:11 PM) |
| Presumably this means we'll get both parts of SG-1's 'New Order' on the 5th, both parts of Atlantis's 'Rising' on the 12th, and then an episode of each series from the 19th onwards. |
The cynical side of me says "No Chance", but then I remembered that this isn't C4 or the Beeb we're talking about here :lol:
jamiearmour - August 17, 2004 05:14 PM (GMT)
I don't care how they do it as long as they are doing it. My only problem is, I'll be on holiday the week of the 5th. I'll need to set my video and watch it when I get back. Damn these sky scedulers and lack of consideration :angry:
Crichton Kicks - August 17, 2004 05:24 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Aug 17 2004, 06:14 PM) |
| I don't care how they do it as long as they are doing it. My only problem is, I'll be on holiday the week of the 5th. I'll need to set my video and watch it when I get back. Damn these sky scedulers and lack of consideration :angry: |
First you want it airing, then you don't....... :rolleyes:
:lol:
jamiearmour - August 17, 2004 05:32 PM (GMT)
Oh be quiet. Go read Unity and get back to me when you've got a review for me.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Crichton Kicks - August 17, 2004 05:45 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Aug 17 2004, 06:32 PM) |
Oh be quiet. Go read Unity and get back to me when you've got a review for me.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: |
Couldn't possibly, wouldn't want to spoil things for you :lol:
jamiearmour - August 17, 2004 07:35 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Angel @ Aug 17 2004, 07:45 PM) |
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Aug 17 2004, 06:32 PM) | Oh be quiet. Go read Unity and get back to me when you've got a review for me.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: |
Couldn't possibly, wouldn't want to spoil things for you :lol:
|
You wouldn't want to spoil things for me????
OK who are you and what have you done with Angel??????????????????
:D :D :D :lmao: :lmao:
Crichton Kicks - August 17, 2004 07:41 PM (GMT)
:lol: :lol: :lol:
This is Bester, Angel's not available right now, if you'd like to leave your name and number he'll be happy to get back to you at his earliest convenience <_<
:D
jamiearmour - August 17, 2004 09:35 PM (GMT)
Fine, My name is jamie.
I am not a number I am a free man!!!!
There I hope thats enough, I hate leaving messages for people :P
Crichton Kicks - August 18, 2004 04:09 PM (GMT)
Phillip Culley - September 13, 2004 06:42 PM (GMT)
Slight update - on the 5th Sky One will broadcast SG-1: 'New Order, part 1' at 8pm, and then on the 12th they will broadcast SG-1: 'New Order, part 2' at 8pm, and Atlantis: Rising, part 1' at 9pm.
Why of course they couldn't have it set up so that SG-1 and Atlantis both started on the same day I don't know. Probably got something important like 'Sexiest Stargate babes', or something... :rolleyes:
Crichton Kicks - September 13, 2004 07:39 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Sep 13 2004, 07:42 PM) |
Slight update - on the 5th Sky One will broadcast SG-1: 'New Order, part 1' at 8pm, and then on the 12th they will broadcast SG-1: 'New Order, part 2' at 8pm, and Atlantis: Rising, part 1' at 9pm.
Why of course they couldn't have it set up so that SG-1 and Atlantis both started on the same day I don't know. Probably got something important like 'Sexiest Stargate babes', or something... :rolleyes: |
Fcukwits :rolleyes:
Persephone - September 13, 2004 07:54 PM (GMT)
They did it with B/A too. Nightmare for crossover eps :rolleyes:
ken1701e - September 14, 2004 06:35 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Sep 13 2004, 08:42 PM) |
| 'Sexiest Stargate babes', |
why is there any? :D :D
willowroolz - September 14, 2004 07:56 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ken1701e @ Sep 14 2004, 07:35 AM) |
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Sep 13 2004, 08:42 PM) | | 'Sexiest Stargate babes', |
why is there any? :D :D
|
Actually, no. That's not to say that Amanda Tapping isn't very attractive - she is - but the series doesn't play on that at all, which I admire.
Crichton Kicks - September 14, 2004 04:32 PM (GMT)
I can't think of too many I must say. Osiris ??
Phillip Culley - September 14, 2004 04:51 PM (GMT)
Apparently Anise (the Tok'ra chick from Season 4) was created to fulfil the 'sexy alien babe' requirement :)
Crichton Kicks - September 14, 2004 04:58 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Sep 14 2004, 05:51 PM) |
| Apparently Anise (the Tok'ra chick from Season 4) was created to fulfil the 'sexy alien babe' requirement :) |
Can't remember her at all :(
Phillip Culley - September 14, 2004 05:03 PM (GMT)
She was the one who bought them the magical superhero armbands in 'Upgrades', as well as beinging the lie detector machine a few episodes later, and (IIRC) she fancied Jack while her symbiont fancied Daniel (it might have been the other way round) :)
Crichton Kicks - September 14, 2004 05:05 PM (GMT)
I remember the name, and the episode in question, but for the life of me I can't remember what she looks like.
Might have to dig out the DVD tonight now to check her out :lol:
jamiearmour - September 28, 2004 09:46 PM (GMT)
I just watched the Stargate to Atlantis, Lowdown on Sky tonight. It all looks good. Nice to see 5 return to the show. i thought the humanoid replicators were an interesting notion and am glad they have escaped from temporal entrapment.
I can't wait till next friday when I will be able to watch the first episode ;)
ken1701e - September 28, 2004 09:52 PM (GMT)
Not watching these - still slowley making my way through season 1!!
jamiearmour - September 28, 2004 09:56 PM (GMT)
Trust me, it is well worth the investment of your time. It only gets better from here on :D
Between this and B5, pretty soon that Star trekkie show that you "used to" like so much will just be a distant memory :lmao:
ken1701e - September 28, 2004 09:59 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Sep 28 2004, 11:56 PM) |
Trust me, it is well worth the investment of your time. It only gets better from here on :D
Between this and B5, pretty soon that Star trekkie show that you "used to" like so much will just be a distant memory :lmao: |
That will never happen :mad: :mad:
STAR TREK RULES (especially NEXT GEN - after all it has one thing the other shows will never have :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: )
Crichton Kicks - September 28, 2004 10:13 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ken1701e @ Sep 28 2004, 10:59 PM) |
| QUOTE (jamiearmour @ Sep 28 2004, 11:56 PM) | Trust me, it is well worth the investment of your time. It only gets better from here on :D
Between this and B5, pretty soon that Star trekkie show that you "used to" like so much will just be a distant memory :lmao: |
That will never happen :mad: :mad:
STAR TREK RULES (especially NEXT GEN - after all it has one thing the other shows will never have :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: )
|
TV Guide have already announced that Stargate's replaced Trek as THE number one sci-fi franchise :P
That one thing you speak of Ken, it's not Rick Berman is it ?? You can keep him ;)
Phillip Culley - September 28, 2004 10:27 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ken1701e @ Sep 28 2004, 10:59 PM) |
| STAR TREK RULES (especially NEXT GEN - after all it has one thing the other shows will never have :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: ) |
Ooh, ooh - is it Wesley Crusher? :)
Or Pulaski - now that was a doctor worth keeping :P
Crichton Kicks - September 28, 2004 10:32 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Sep 28 2004, 11:27 PM) |
| Or Pulaski - now that was a doctor worth keeping :P |
Definitely better than that other one, what was her name.......?? :evil:
ken1701e - September 28, 2004 10:49 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Sep 29 2004, 12:27 AM) |
| QUOTE (ken1701e @ Sep 28 2004, 10:59 PM) | | STAR TREK RULES (especially NEXT GEN - after all it has one thing the other shows will never have :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: ) |
Ooh, ooh - is it Wesley Crusher? :)
Or Pulaski - now that was a doctor worth keeping :P
|
:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
jamiearmour - September 29, 2004 09:02 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Angel @ Sep 29 2004, 12:32 AM) |
| QUOTE (Phillip Culley @ Sep 28 2004, 11:27 PM) | | Or Pulaski - now that was a doctor worth keeping :P |
Definitely better than that other one, what was her name.......?? :evil:
|
I can't remember her name either. All I know is she was the mother of the Devil. Her child was annoying. (He must have been adopted but noone had the heart to tell him) :lol: Jean Luc could never have spawned such a hideous disaster of a teen sidekick.
ken1701e - September 30, 2004 06:47 AM (GMT)
Dont make me :mad: you wouldnt like me when I'm :mad:
ken1701e - September 30, 2004 06:48 AM (GMT)
Crichton Kicks - September 30, 2004 11:30 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ken1701e @ Sep 30 2004, 07:48 AM) |
|
That's her. What's her name again ????????? :whistling:
willowroolz - September 30, 2004 11:31 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Angel @ Sep 30 2004, 12:30 PM) |
| QUOTE (ken1701e @ Sep 30 2004, 07:48 AM) | |
That's her. What's her name again ????????? :whistling:
|
McCoy? :unsure:
Crichton Kicks - September 30, 2004 11:32 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (willowroolz @ Sep 30 2004, 12:31 PM) |
| QUOTE (Angel @ Sep 30 2004, 12:30 PM) | | QUOTE (ken1701e @ Sep 30 2004, 07:48 AM) | |
That's her. What's her name again ????????? :whistling:
|
McCoy? :unsure:
|
Nah. Process of elimination. Everyone remembers McCoy. Is it Pulaski ??
goth willow fan - September 30, 2004 11:34 AM (GMT)
Dr Masher oslt wasn't it?
willowroolz - September 30, 2004 11:37 AM (GMT)
Crichton Kicks - September 30, 2004 11:48 AM (GMT)